Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nobody can overlook the fact that in this sophisticated, and progressive world, where we live, beneficial communication plays a pivotal role in a group work success. While some people hold the opinion that it is better for classmates to communicate with each other through email for their projects, some others stand at the other end of the continuum and believe that face to face communication is more effective. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter group, and the reasons to substantiate this point of view are elaborated hereupon.
To begin with, communicating in person leads to better results because of the decline in probable error. To be more specific, when people speak face to face, they can ask about the vague parts of the project and explain more details to each other, while this opportunity can not be reached through email. For example, when I was in high school, we were asked to do an assignment for our physics class. I remember that one of my classmates send me some data for our project, and I put all of that data in the computer program. It took me a long time, and I stayed all that night to finish. When we delivered our final project to our teacher, she told us that our results are totally wrong. After spending a significant amount of time and investigating all of the parts of our project, we understood that the data, which I had entered, was completely wrong because I should have changed the units. Had my classmates explained that details in person, I would not have made that huge mistake.
Furthermore, it is probable that all of the group members do not access to their email all the time; as a result, they can not be in touch every moment, and this issue causes a delay in group work. In other words, If people allocate all of the assignment face to face, and plan for the whole parts of the project in person, they can prevent the afterward problems and delays. For example, when I was at university, we were asked to do a summer project after passing our internship. Unfortunately, we could not organize our project in person because all of my groupmates went to their cities; therefore, we had to contact each other through email. One of our group mates had gone to an island for his summer holiday, and he did not access to the internet on that island. AS you can imagine this issue causes huge trouble for us because that boy was responsible for one of the most important parts of the projects. Consequently, we had to wait for him to come back. Had we planned for our projects in person, we would not have faced those kinds of troubles.
In a nutshell, having the aforementioned reasons, and examples into account, I am of the idea that communicating in person will lead to better outcomes because not only that decreases the risk of a mistake, but also it guarantees the completion of our project in time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To be successful a business must spend a lot of money on advertising 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is easier to maintain good health today than in the past. 81
- Which of the following do you think would be the most effective way that a teacher can use to make the students more interested in classes?1.Use more technological ways2.Group discussion3.Real-world examples 73
- TPO 39, Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ficant amount of time and investigating all of the parts of our project, we understood tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ke. Furthermore, it is probable that all of the group members do not access to their em...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ork. In other words, If people allocate all of the assignment face to face, and plan for t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60038986355 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65905660365 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463937621832 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9279509391 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.65 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230071984319 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075929077465 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362922504891 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150449200574 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161531447974 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.