Which of the following do you think would be the most effective way that a teacher can use to make the students more interested in classes?
1. Use more technological ways
2. Group discussion
3. Real-world examples
Nobody can overlook the fact that in this progressive and sophisticated world, where we live, using new methods in classes play a pivotal role in the students` attraction toward the classes. As far as I am concerned, I believe that using technological way is a more efficient approach, and the justifications that substantiate my point of view are elaborated hereupon.
To begin with, using technological methods is significantly beneficial in making students interested in classes because they are fascinating for students. To be more specific, technological methods include devices that are able to apply intriguing effects on the lesson`s texts that are presented to students in the classes. For example, about three weeks ago, I watched a television program about applying new technology for a better life. One part of the program had been allocating to education, and it showed children in the classroom that were taught by using a high-tech device. The teacher touched a panel and presented various maps to children, and all of the learners were amazed. As a result, by making the class atmosphere more interesting, the learning quality will improve considerably.
Furthermore, using technological way in classes, save a noticeable amount of time not only for teachers but also for students; consequently, can interest the students. In other words, by utilizing these objects teachers do not have to waste a tremendous amount of time to write on the board, and students did not have to wait for the teacher to finish their writing. As a result, teachers can use this saving time for teaching more subjects to students; also, students can do more research in that time. For instance, when I was in university all of my professors used to use projectors for showing us the class content instead of writing them, in this way we had more time to learn more in every class. Also, we used to all of our schoolwork by searching on the internet instead of spending a lot of time for writing a report, and we just used to copy them from the internet and paste to our reports documents.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons into account, Using the technical ways are highly efficacious in attracting students to the classes.
Not only does it save a lot of time for teachers and students, but also it creates a fabulous atmosphere for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | mohajeri4868 | 73 | view |
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects of the way young people behave. Agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is easier to maintain good health today than in the past. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To be successful a business must spend a lot of money on advertising 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...presented various maps to children, and all of the learners were amazed. As a result, by m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04325699746 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.032474708 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508905852417 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9404707621 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.133333333 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31771854709 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11704276747 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699031009368 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162157940209 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084261627207 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.