Not surprisingly, public awareness regarding the societal decisions has significantly increased over the last decades. Due to this fact that the youngsters now are consisting a considerable amount of the whole population, the discussion has centered on whether this growing caste plays a critical role in human society or not. While I believe that it can not be generalized to all cases, I tend to disagree with this notion that they have a little influence on government future perspective.
The first point to support this is that most countries' political atmosphere has changed compared to the last decades. Needless to say, nowadays people have been growing appetite for living in democracy environment. Hence, most leaders inevitably abandoned their dictatorial attitude and widely have capitulated to pursue democratic system. In addition, the young population has a right to vote for their favorite political parties. In fact, youngsters widely impact on the next few years of their country development indirectly.
Moreover, thanks to the significant development in the educational process, there has been an abolishment in illiteracy rate of people all over the world. In fact, most young people have been involved in the highly-organized educational institutions which have paved the ways for students to be exposed to the latest information in different field like economics, politics, and other social breaking news. Conspicuously, not only can it broaden their horizon but also they have a better understanding of their society environment. Therefore, the young population has a great influence in different aspects of government decision making.
On the other hand, it has been argued that fast pace of life and development of social networks have made people more indifferent to their surroundings. However, it is clearly perceived that recent technologies accompanied with the advent of internet networks such as Facebook or Twitter are set to play a critical role in being in touch with public authority. In essence, compared to the past, it has been more facilitated, especially for youngsters to share their interests and novel thoughts to take part in future of their society.
From what have been discussed, it should be noted that juveniles can be impressive on different aspects of society. As it was mentioned, not only the new structure of different countries but also the high level of worldwide literacy have caused people to have more intervention with authorities. In addition, it is immature if the role of recent communication devices overlooks.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 80
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 80
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 76
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ue to this fact that the youngsters now are consisting a considerable amount of the whole popu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240990990991 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.164414414414 0.158761421928 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121621621622 0.0866891130778 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0563063063063 0.046263068375 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.045045045045 0.0685040099705 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128378378378 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0698198198198 0.0351676179071 199% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.08463415907 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0382882882883 0.0309702414327 124% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0810810810811 0.0887237588012 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00900900900901 0.0209618222197 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0045045045045 0.0139019557991 32% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2586.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 404.0 408.028673835 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.40099009901 5.86048508987 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393564356436 0.338922669872 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316831683168 0.251872472559 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.267326732673 0.174417080927 153% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.190594059406 0.112833075102 169% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08463415907 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532178217822 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 60.0501353295 59.2087087015 101% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4444444444 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7134458973 48.84282405 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 120.699889404 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.644075263715 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 54.1276127613 45.7405998639 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.65254237288 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367832551354 0.300154397459 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0901392904293 0.103427244359 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0484565336766 0.0752933317313 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.542392809341 0.497263757937 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122575474603 0.151897553556 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147367461312 0.114077575197 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563611639595 0.0781384742642 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.381075527633 0.336927656856 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0487341196972 0.067059652881 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253258246904 0.210909579961 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306672187272 0.0618886996521 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.