Do you agree or disagree with the following statment? In the twenty years there will be fewer cars in the use than there are today. Use spesifik reason and example to support your answer.
In recent decades, we have witnessed a rapid growth of the number of domestic cars with the help of the development of modern technologies. The arguments collide in the topic that whether cars in use will decline in twenty years. From my perspective, we will witness a drop in cars in use.
First of all, governments are building and planning new underground and bus lines every year. Everyone, as an ordinary citizen, can see the development of the cities' means of transports. That is to say, it has become much more convenient and commodious or us to get around. I am saying without any exaggeration that we can go any where we want in the city just by the public transports. Besides, it is also much cheaper by using transports than driving cars. If we want to drive, we have to pay at least the gasoline and the fee of parking lots. Since only the fee of parking lots equals to the expense of taking transports, it will cost a lot by driving. To summarize, the decrease of chances that people will use cars lead to the decline of cars in use.
In addition, with the appeal of environmental protection, citizens will become unwilling to use cars for the purpose of protecting environments. The exhaust released by cars every year is a major source of greenhouse gas. It is known to all that greenhouse gas has huge and negative effects on the earth, especially its temperature. Moreover, there are many substitutes of cars like public means of transports that I mentioned before and walking which is a way of exercise. There is also evidence show that the amount of people who buy cars is declining these years. So, it can be foreseen that the number of cars on the road will not increase in a few years and then it will decline.
In a nutshell, the decrease of chances that people will use cars and the number of g who buy cars serve to the decline of cars in use.
- "The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time period, however, the price of milk at the local Excello Food Market has 50
- "One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towerscomplex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be.Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment ar 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskA recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...citizen, can see the development of the cities means of transports. That is to say, it...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...without any exaggeration that we can go any where we want in the city just by the public ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, moreover, so, then, at least, in addition, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52941176471 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67392251041 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1384893203 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5555555556 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241306564971 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080905635323 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795418859448 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173877450006 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370775198981 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.