Do you agree or disagree with the followings statement? Teachers’ performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers.
Nowadays, there is a buzz topic about whether professors’ performance at class should be evaluated by students or other teachers. Even though some people may claim that the teachers who works together may be the better choices to evaluate their colleagues, form my perspective, I prefer students who attend the professors’ class to give their evaluations.
To begin with, the evaluations of students who attend teacher’s class can be much more fair and impartial due to their class experiences. On the average, students will evaluate their teacher when the class is over. Because they really experienced teacher’s teaching and atmosphere of the class, they have learnt what their teacher has exactly taught. Thus they can judge and decide whether the teacher’s teaching meet their demand for knowledge and instilling. As a result, they can evaluate their teacher more fairly and impartially owing to their learning and achievements. For instance, my cousin Jim who study in the university in the USA. He needs to evaluate their professors who teach his subjects by filling a questionnaire. They will decide wether their teaching is helpful for students and how is the quality according to their experiences. In contrast, if the schools asked other teachers to evaluate, the result will not be typical and have no representativeness to judge a teacher’s teaching quality because other teachers do not really experience.
Furthermore, the evaluations from students can help professors improve themselves better. In general, in the evaluations, students will point out the advantages and disadvantages. They will give suggestions to the aspects which can help professors to meet the demands. They will also give solutions and what students really would like to study and learn about on the lessons. Thus the teacher will know and decide to change the teaching styles or methods to meet students’ requirement. As a result, the teaching results and the quality will be greatly improved. In contrast, if others teachers need to evaluate teachers, they will not know the aspects they do not do well in and they need to improve.
Admittedly, letting other teachers to evaluate the teacher may efficiently reduce the bias and the prejudice occurring among the students. As we know, if a student do not like the professor’s teaching styles, he may not give the professor a good evaluation even though they do well in this class. Thus the professors will not get the ideal results even though he put efforts a lot.
In a nutshell, in the terms of all above mentioned, I prefer to let students who attend professor’s class to evaluate professors who teach their disciplines due to the fairness and improvement on teaching quality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | atoizfake | 60 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | mitra.m | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-02 | amirbahman | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... what their teacher has exactly taught. Thus they can judge and decide whether the t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...o study and learn about on the lessons. Thus the teacher will know and decide to cha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...even though they do well in this class. Thus the professors will not get the ideal r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, really, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, in general, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2850678733 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13483235449 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441176470588 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7927418551 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25065108322 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930375371675 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751482238804 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161536493524 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569074193811 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.