some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them. Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people claim that children of different abilities should be taught together, while others suggest that talented students should be divided from others and receive special treatment from their teachers. This essay will fathom both views, then followed by my own one.
On the one hand, supporters of putting together students with distinct capacities maintain that there are copious benefits in this act. To begin with, a mixed class mode can be of great importance to students’ competitiveness improvement. This is especially true for the students with low grades because this mode can render them an opportunity to realize their difference with the intelligent ones and to learn from them. Through trying to catch up with the good students, they can become more competitive in their study than before. In addition, instructing pupils together can exert a positive impact on their altruism cultivation. In the miscellaneous class, talented students are more often than not required to help other classmates who have difficulty in understanding what the teacher says in class. Having acquired the experience of helping others, they may be more willing to give others a helping hand in the future.
On the other hand, the positives of separating intelligent students from others cannot be ignored. First of all, this separation can boost the intelligent students’ study efficiency. Compared with the integrated class mode, it can provide more time for them to focus on what they are learning rather than to help others. Meanwhile, their teachers can increase the difficulty of the class according to the good students’ performance, allowing them to accumulate more knowledge in a short time. Moreover, this class separation can reduce the stress of the students with poor learning skills in that they may not be disturbed by the comparison with the good ones and enjoy themselves in class.
To conclude, from my point of view, students of all kinds are supposed to be instructed together for this can motivate the students with good learning abilities to be more altruistic and the ones with poor study skills to own competitive edges in their study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-01 | gagandeep@13 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | DIEU PHUONG | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 85 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfied job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th views, then followed by my own one. On the one hand, supporters of putting t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 937, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve others a helping hand in the future. On the other hand, the positives of sepa...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d ones and enjoy themselves in class. To conclude, from my point of view, stud...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, in addition, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24425287356 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84461714071 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8017588719 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18701973493 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716137530914 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758799407728 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149596900711 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911683402815 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.