Do you agree or disagree? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning. Give your reasons and specific examples.
Do you agree or disagree? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning. Give your reasons and specific examples.
The issue of whether being both popular by their students and effective teacher at the same time is difficult aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if were asked would agree with the statement that teachers could not be both likable for students and help them in the learning process effectively, while others have a negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I am in agreement with the latter group. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is that a close relationship between teachers and students encourage students to grasp their courses more enthusiastically. This phenomenon is proved in many cases that when you like a person because you care about him, you attempt to make him pleased. Therefore, forming a close relationship is the best approach to be effective instructors. Take my own experience as an example. When I was a university student, my biology professor behaved me in an unfriendly manner. Because of his behavior, I was hated of biology and in the final exam I failed, while I passed other exams with great mark even though they were more difficult compared to biology. The main reason was I did not like his class and I never listened to him. As you see, the relationship between teachers and students can significantly impact on the process of learning.
In approaching this issue, apart from the reason given above another reason that deserves some words is that the close relationship with students motivate students to participate in the discussion about the topic, as students have not fear of asking their question. As a consequence, every time they confront the subject which is ambiguous for them they ask their question directly from their teacher. Then teachers provide them a lot of details and information to perceive the subject clearly. In contrast, if their teacher is a strict person, without any doubt, many students do not ask their questions from their teacher. Thus, their classmates might mislead them by their careless answers.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments that explored above, I am of the opinion that making close relationship is not only make the teacher popular by students, but also this way would be very useful to be more effective in the process of teaching because a student is enthusiastic to learn their lessons. Moreover, they can ask their question without any fear which helps them to understand their lessons deeply.
- TPO 44 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 85
- TPO 25 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO2 Q1 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unfriendly manner" with adverb for "unfriendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tudent, my biology professor behaved me in an unfriendly manner. Because of his behavior, I was hated o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, apart from, in contrast, by the way, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78428463973 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498915401302 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.2133754659 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.772727273 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426367725359 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133235639329 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150779320931 0.0737576698707 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342177171148 0.150856017488 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.331471163063 0.0645574589148 513% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.