TPO22 Integrated question
The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to why ethanol is not a proper replacement for gasoline and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that these claims are not convincing and opposes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading discusses that nowadays, global warming is the main environmental problems caused by fossil fuels that would not solve by the increase the use of ethanol as a common fuel. In contrast, the professor provides information to illustrate to us this idea is not true. He states that the main reason for global warming is the increase of releasing carbon dioxide into the air and plants can absorb carbon dioxide from the air. He says for producing the ethanol, companies should grow the corn as a main constituent material of the ethanol, as a result with this way they help to reduce the amount of co2 and decrease the global warming. As the professor said plants can remove the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Clearly disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor.
Second, the article pushes forth the idea that the same amount of ethanol would significantly decline the amount of plant rather than fuels. Result in the amount of plant that uses by others would reduce. However, according to the professor, the main component of the plant that uses for producing ethanol is the cellulose. Cellulose finds in parts of plants that are not eaten by animals. In other words, using plants is not affect the food sources for other animals. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim maid in reading unsubstantiated.
Finally, the reading posits that it is impossible that the ethanol fuel can compete with gasoline fuel in final price and fossil fuels would very cheaper than ethanol. The professor refutes this point by explaining that in the future the factory that produces the ethanol will increase the amount of their product, as a consequence the price of the ethanol will drop. In fact, whatever a product be more available, it’s the price of would go down.
- TPO 40 Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 43 Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait un 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use spec 75
- TPO 36 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. Use specific reasons and examples to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 651, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of co2 and decrease the global warming. As the professor said plants can remove th...
^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., it's the price of would go down.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0316091954 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.634320959 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485632183908 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.396801025 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470235328687 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136624074608 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10206408414 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27566511068 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721467916359 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.