Do you agree or disagree?
It is more important to use the land for human needs or to save endangered animals
By and large, it is beyond doubt that the earth contains 22% of the land. In this regard, using it intelligently is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars about this controversy whether the land should be used for human requirements or to preserve animal species. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the notion by agreeing that using the land for the betterment of humanity is more important. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my idea is that with the dawn of human civilization, the population of humans has increased. To fulfill their basic needs of living, the proper use of land is significant. With the extension of residents, their demands have escalated too. In this contemporary world, people have adapted their requirements to luxury by staying in their comfort zone. It is crystal clear that the building of farms is necessary in order to provide food, houses for shelter, and factories to not only aid the labor of humans but also, for the preservation of food. Urban areas have taken over the rural areas by constructing farms and industries. If they were already sufficient, people would not have to immigrate to the vast lands. Vividly, the use of land is crucial for humans. By way of illustration, 2 years ago I went to my ancestors' village. There were a lot of factories and farms there which were not there when I was a kid. In the past, there was a forest that included a diverse majority of animals. This made me realize the growing needs of society have taken more of the earth's land.
The second exquisite rationale behind my belief is rooted in the fact that people can find other methods to save endangered animals. To maintain the balance of the ecosystem as well as to protect the animals from extinction, it is significant to protect the animal community. With the advent of modernization and science, scientists and engineers have developed several ways to protect endangered species of the ecosystem. When deforestation occurs, animals are either being transferred to other forests or some are being held in zoos for entertainment purposes. Even if humans are taking over land, they are not selfish to leave endangered animals behind. Therefore, there is no need to worry as long as we work in a balance to protect our ecosystem.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer although the protection of animal and plant species is the responsibility of people on earth, it is more important to meet the land needs of humans. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth reiterating: first, the human population is strenuously elevating, second, animals can be saved by other approaches. As a writer, I vehemently urge society to make better use of the land and appreciate the beauty of nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-19 | Safa Arshad | 73 | view |
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 72
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 81
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some think 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... to preserve animal species. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the notion by a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89795918367 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85219396471 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5469995388 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3076923077 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351263685618 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835997216489 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824753404753 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217114446597 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516199518602 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.