Importance of books is always admitted by people in both modern era and before last decades. In addition, movies and cinema play a significant role as a cultural product in human life. But I disagree that one can learn a lot about another people from books and movies that he likes. I explain my opinion in following reasons:
First, books and movies are not always based on reality and they are more results of imaginations and dreams. Persons and characters existed in books and movies are often made by the artistic view of a writer. Many times the goal of writing a book or a movie is teaching the right manner or behavior to society instead of showing real persons and how they really are. For example a TV series like FRIENDS try to show a true friendship between some boys and girls who have relationship for years however in daily life people do not behave as like as they do.
In other point, books and movies are just on papers or TV and cinema and they can not reflect the all characteristics of people. Based on psychologists researches a person must contact face to face with the other people to know them better and no other tool could replace with direct relationship method. These entertainment products can not transform some senses very well like happiness, anger, concern, love or the other human being's reactions. For instance to learn about people one should know what people do in danger or when they are scared and it just would happen well while this person is near to people and experiences deeply their senses.
Third, what one can learn form books and movies that he likes is full of bias. When one watches a movie he likes, he admires just characters offered in that movie and he does not meet many people in other unfavorable books and movies. So range of people might he learns from favorite books and movies is limited because he just selected some types of people he prefer to know. For example a person who likes romantic movies follows in field of romance products and he will learn about romantic people.
In conclusion, reading books or watching movie surely have been advocated during the history but we can defend them as enough resources to learn about people. In fact they are necessary but not enough.
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 76
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 76
- TPO16:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 80
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to form'
Suggestion: to form
...r senses. Third, what one can learn form books and movies that he likes is full ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...e just selected some types of people he prefer to know. For example a person who likes...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, third, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68010075567 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38249873269 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518891687657 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4500157567 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.294117647 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476831524047 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162303381017 0.076458572812 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16588701088 0.0737576698707 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264010224021 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122828187203 0.0645574589148 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.