Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about a person from the types of friends this person has.
The question is whether we can recognize a human’s feature in consideration to his friends or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this issue; however, I surmise that this idea can be rather correct and wrong. I feel this way for some two reasons, which I will explore them to empower my arguments in following essay:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that friends usually play a crucial role in everyone's life. In such a hectic life, people need others to mitigate their pains and troubles; hence, in this condition the friendships start burgeoning. One should notice that the main goal of friendships is that each two side are willing to share common interests because they are looking for obtain happiness and joy; consequently, without this factor, people will be disappointed quickly and try to get rid of this situation. It goes without saying that human beings choose their friends carefully and take them into account as the twin's themselves; subsequently, it will be obvious for us to discern the personality's people through observing their friends' characters. To elucidate, take my own experience. When I was studying in high school in a small city, there was a sport group that I was attempting to joint them and finally I could do it. After a while time, one day the swimming team's coach of that city called me and proposed me to participate in his team. I remember that suggestion could make me surprised because I could not know thing about swimming, so I asked him" why me?” His answer was that since he had observed me in that same mentioned sport group above and due to my physical appearance, he thought that I was a perfect choice for his team; as a result, this example demonstrates that our friends can be as a symbol from our personality.
On the other hand, it can be said that all of friendships are not related to our internal needs. Sometimes humans approach others to obtain an external purpose. For instance, take an example people who work in a place as colleague. Those may not share the same interests and thoughts; however, they stay as friend to reach to their goals in work field. In such a relationship, one side can have negative features but it is not necessary that other side carries the same wrong behavior. When I was working on my proposal in the university, I got help from a girl who was smoking but frankly she was very a clever person. One day, my professor saw us while that girl was smoking again. Then my professor called me to his room and started speaking about disadvantages of smoke. Briefly, I could convince him that I was not a smoky person and finally he apologized about his judgment. One should know that this method does not work well perennially.
As I have illustrated, this conclusion could be drawn that this question can have different answers in diverse circumstances. So before any judgment, human beings have to consider to details of relationship between two persons and the goal that they search for it.
- do you agree or disagree?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 79
- tpo14 80
- do you agree or disagree? the bosses have to pay their employees to get a university degree. 90
- Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfied to future generation? 90
- tpo42 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 656, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to us'.
Suggestion: obvious to us
...ns themselves; subsequently, it will be obvious for us to discern the personalitys people thro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, finally, frankly, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, i feel, speaking about, as a result, to begin with, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 94.0 43.0788530466 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 529.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77693761815 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72149488791 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529300567108 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.7354751156 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.863636364 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0454545455 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.04545454545 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188854186226 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530542932915 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324628854795 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12330778623 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149220642612 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.