tpo17
Both the reading and lecturer are about bird populations that their habitats and numbers may have declined during next years in The United State. The reading provides three reasons for this reduction and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that bird habitats will be affected negatively by human populations who start growing more and more because human beings prefer to destroy wetlands, grasslands and other wilderness areas for constructing more houses. This point is challenged by the professor. She points out that some birds may suffer from this circumstance; however, other bird species like pigeon will take advantage of larger and bigger habitats, even some birds such as hawk will have opportunity to pray a large number of pigeons.
Secondly, the article contends that when the human populations grow, one should notice that spontaneously numerous agricultural products will be needed for feeding people, again farmers will destroy wild areas for gaining more farmlands and this matter will have harmful impacts on birds populations; in contrast, the professor believes that nowadays farmers attempt to use the new version of crops which are productive and provide more foods and even more these new crops require less and less lands.
Finally, the reading passage states that applying pesticides particularly chemical pesticides can have irrecoverable effects on birds because the mentioned pesticides can pollute water and fruits which are the main resource of food for these poor birds; consequently, they will not be able to survive or reproduce. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer again and she poses that today's the technology have developed new and much less harmful and toxic pesticides and also scholars could create some new plants which genetically are resistance in front of pesticides; therefore, eating them will not harm birds populations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | heartqq | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | eeemmmyyy | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sahar90o | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | aldovega0516 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Mostafa93106325 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
- which one is better for students during breaks? taking different courses or doing voluntarily work to improving the aspects of life in city's universities. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with this sentence? the teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 66
- Do you agree or disagree? Universities should spend more money on improving facilities than on hiring famous professors. 80
- do you agree or disagree?playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 522, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...h as hawk will have opportunity to pray a large number of pigeons. Secondly, the article conte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 491, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...n more these new crops require less and less lands. Finally, the reading passage ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as for, even so, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3949044586 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61600506387 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595541401274 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 138.427678671 49.2860985944 281% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.222222222 110.228320801 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8888888889 21.698381199 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.1111111111 7.06452816374 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440321038893 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155457537795 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106494010042 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248902710312 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813302995893 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.3589403974 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.