tpo20
Both the reading and lecture are about the "let it burn" policy which allowed forest fire to burn itself as soon as possible without damage in 1960s in The United State; however, in 1988 this policy caused national park in Yellowstone to be destroyed. The reading provides three types of damage in this park and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious because she believes that fires are natural creative phenomenon not destructive.
First of all, the author of reading declares that almost trees and other plants died out and tall trees did not allow smoke to leave the forest; hence, small planets also chocked up. This point is challenged by the professor. She points out that when the trees destroyed, other new plants and vegetables had a new opportunity to colonize. Furthermore, small planets that previously did not have any chance for growing due to shade of trees, could grow quickly and finally the national park confronted a variety of planets.
Secondly, the article contends that this policy harmed small and large animals because fire not only eliminated their habitats, but also their food chain declined; in contrast, the lecturer expresses that when small plants superseded with trees, new habitats formed for small creatures such as rabbits and hairs; therefore, with increasing the population of small animals, their predators had an opportunity to recover their population faster and food chain goes up again.
Finally, the reading passage states that fire could have negative impacts on visitors and tourists and they preferred not to visit the national park of Yellowstone; consequently, the destructive consequences of this event on local business is obvious. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer and she poses that fires could reduce the number of tourists if they happen every year but such a huge fire which expend and synthesize with strong wind and low rain, is unusual and it occurs rarely.
- do you agree or disagree? people gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life or not. 76
- tpo32 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One quality that a successful leader must have is the ability to make decisions quickly. When leaders take too much time to make decisions, they will be seen as ineffective by the people they lead. 90
- Tpo 23 80
- Tpo32 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...self as soon as possible without damage in 1960s in The United State; however, in 1988 t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15243902439 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51825577248 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.361881761 49.2860985944 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.0 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 21.698381199 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7 7.06452816374 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294939597903 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104273641133 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728302583057 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167241313537 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582534987297 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.