TPO20 Integrated writing
The reading and the lecture both discusses incidents that happened after huge and significant forest fire in Yellowstone. The author, first of all, mentions a policy named " let it burn", and after that explains the bad and evil effects of this forest fire on this forest. On contrast, the speaker believes that fire is a part of natural cycle, and also says this important forest fire was creative. Then, she opposes each of agreements described in the article.
First of all, the lecturer expresses that this event caused new plants colonized there, and it made the forest to be diverse.she claims that new small plants replaced to the trees which require the open and shade area. However, the article states that this huge and devastating fire destroyed all of the vegetation, and made the forest as a desert.
Moreover, on the basis of the passage, the forest wildlife was influenced. The author points out that many of large animals such as deers ran away when they faced to the fire, and also some small animals couldn't escape and survive themselves. The reading describes this incident as a reason of disruptive of food chain. The speaker rebuts this claim. she states that when new plants arose there, new animals went there, and choosed as their habitats such as rabbits. she expresse it could make the food chain more vigorous and stronger.
Finally, according to the lecture, tourists went there next year after the incident and each year after that. that's how the speaker retorts the last argument made by the author.
- Now children do not behavior as well as the children did in the past. Which one of thefollowing measure do you think can help children (age 5~10) behave better?A. Control the time they spend on TV or movie.B. Take more time to chat with children.C. Monito 70
- tpo27. integrated 75
- TPO20 Integrated writing 65
- TPO 45 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...his huge and devastating fire destroyed all of the vegetation, and made the forest as a de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...o the fire, and also some small animals couldnt escape and survive themselves. The read...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s a reason of disruptive of food chain. The speaker rebuts this claim. she states t...
^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...d chain. The speaker rebuts this claim. she states that when new plants arose there...
^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...osed as their habitats such as rabbits. she expresse it could make the food chain m...
^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thats
... the incident and each year after that. thats how the speaker retorts the last argume...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... the incident and each year after that. thats how the speaker retorts the last argume...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92337164751 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36333566605 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4343127654 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217090028817 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707899837448 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614919213566 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121493390136 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736167652238 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.