do you agree or disagree? parents could offer their children money for each high grade
Recently, parents have played a very crucial role in shaping their kids' personalities. Some people believe that if parents offer their children money for getting high grades in schools, they could spoil them; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts on this belief. From a personal perspective, it is a creative idea to give children money for each high grade given that parents could improve their children's financial responsibilities and motivations.
The first and foremost point, provided that students get rewards for their excellence, they could be encouraged to study more. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on that is, high school students in Egypyt who get money from their parents for their high grades usually could admit to prestigious universities given that their parents encourage them to study. Furthermore, this approach could have a virtue on children's personalities; to put it in another way, they could be taught how to set goals and crystalize objectives, which help them to build up their future with prosperity. Consequently, offering children money for their high grades is indespensible.
Next, coupled with motivation to succeed, financial responsibility is another benefit of giving students money rewards for their excellence. This approach could teach children how to handle their own budgets. For instance, an abundance of succussful entrepreneurs in California claims that one of the most important factor of their financial success is that their parents offered them money for their high grades given that it taught them how to be not only savvy, but also financially independent. Likewise, it amplified their confidence, which helped them to go up aganist tremendous odds and overcome their fear. Therefore, money reward is imperative for sa successful life.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, offering school-age children money for each high grade has integral virtues and underestimating the significance of these benefits is not logical. it is suggested parenst teach their kids about momey before givging it to them as rewards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | zaid | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 71 | view |
- living beside our extended family was more important in the past than it is today? agree or disagree 76
- people nowadays spend too much money on their pets although they are better uses of this money agree or disagree 95
- The widespread of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before? how this increase in the available information influenced life in today's world? 90
- tpo 9 60
- tpo 10 the decline of the sea otter 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...cance of these benefits is not logical. it is suggested parenst teach their kids a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42771084337 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95433104548 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545180722892 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7845610401 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477074869899 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199895709719 0.076458572812 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128763578237 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340995032053 0.150856017488 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814601027704 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.