Do you agree or disagree? People learn from the friends beside them.
The question is whether friends usually affect us directly especially when we are near them or not. Everyone with regard to his private vantage point can maintain a specific direction toward this issue. Some may agree and some others can survey this statement from another perspective; however, I am inclined to concur because of the important role of friends in all aspects of our life. I feel this way in some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay for strengthening my point of view:
To begin with, one should not forget that friends play a pivotal role in each other’s social, educational and sportive life and this list seems endless. Such a circumstance, learning or getting effect would be inevitable. The soul of humanistic looks for exploring new points; consequently, it attempts to imitate others' behavior. This feature can be intense when human beings rely on someone. Spontaneously, a friendship creates and lasts based on the trust. If we accept a person to exist in our life, it means that we allow him/ her to influence on our performance, behavior, characteristic and list goes on. To elucidate, I remember in dormitory life, I could make some new friends. Those were very active and joyful people; conversely, I was always an idol person that even I was not be able to organize my program. Living with each other provided an opportunity for me to modify my route. This condition exactly was similar to going to the gym and observing numerous people and receiving motivation for doing exercise. One should notice that unintentionally humans obtain and learn new things from their friends.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact being at the same age. Nobody could overlook this reality that the most time of everyone is spent with his friends. Based on a study which has been done in a well-known and valid institution, this conclusion has been gained that people have a deep tendency toward their friends and even more they prefer to consult them more than their family. One of striking reasons for this matter is that proposed ideas or done things by friends look like people's own experiences or at least those activities appear to be up-dated not old fashion or strange. Take for an example a kid who plays with his friends in the kindergarten and she learns no to eat the broccoli due to observing of this behavior among at the same age children. No matter how efforts do her parents, she has carved this disgust in her mind.
As I have illustrated, I strongly advocate that people would rather behave in the same way that their friends act because of being beside them for a long time and having a power affinity to each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he trust. If we accept a person to exist in our life, it means that we allow him/...
^^
Line 4, column 796, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ways an idol person that even I was not be able to organize my program. Living wit...
^^
Line 6, column 683, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ends in the kindergarten and she learns no to eat the broccoli due to observing of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, well, at least, i feel, to begin with, with regard to, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81857451404 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64877074381 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578833693305 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1388416259 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.238095238 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17139289228 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437623434595 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04610315212 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111518538224 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239849227516 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.