Do you agree or disagree with the statement: competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships?
Nowadays, competition with friends has become the top concern in society. In many people's opinion, those competitions affect friendships negatively because only one person can win at last, which hurts their relationship a lot. Contrary to those people's idea is my perspective that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following part.
What must be prioritized is that competitions, such as football matches and video games, make it possible for people to spend more time with friends, which can strengthen their friendship. In detail, nowadays people are facing fierce competition, which places them under great pressure. Under such circumstances, people will spend less time with their friends and even lose their friends. There is no denying that holding some competitions between friends not only helps them relax, thus reducing their pressure, but also increase the time they spend together, which will definitely improve their relationship. For example, when I played basketball with my best friend Joey, who I had not talked to for a long time due to busy schoolwork, during my break time last week, I communicated a lot with him and our relationship became closer. Therefore, I believe that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships.
What is equally important is that competition with friends helps people achieve success. In detail, peer pressure from friends stimulates people to show their best performance, which helps them reach their goals more efficiently. This reminds me of the story between my best friend Tom and me. Last year, both Tom and I successfully organized an auction during a P&G recruitment interview, which we only had 40 hours to prepare. Since we were in the same group, the peer pressure pushed both of us to try our best to design a strategy to make the auction items appreciate and develop a negotiating plan with the sponsors. Finally, both of us were highly recognized by the superior and transferred to formal employees. Thus, I reckon that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships.
In conclusion, I strongly think that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships, not only because people can spend more time with friends, but also because competitions can help people achieve success more easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-23 | xinxindiandeng | 64 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | xinxindiandeng | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | xinxindiandeng | 70 | view |
- A friend who is intelligent is much better than a friend with a good sense of humor 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more interested in politics today than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree it is a waste of money for a government to fund space travel 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86471723277 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52987012987 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4669571306 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297774941421 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124327652025 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11824046895 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220850382529 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341469674811 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.