Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Many people think that athletes or celebrities that are from the entertainment business can change their careers to be politicians. Do you agree or disagree with this idea of profession change?
To promote the well-being of the public, there are many ways can be employed. In terms of the ability of politician, what kind of person’s characteristic can provide their profession capability to boost the society? Among the following statement, I totally agree that athletes or celebrities can change their career to devote in politic.
To begin with, everyone has rights to choose their career path. To be more concise, even though the athletes and celebrities used to do sports and entertain people, they still have liberty to engage in different fields. What is more, according to the 10,000 hours rule says that it takes ten thousand hours of practice to achieve mastery in a field, so if they want to make an alteration of their career, why they could not do that? Thus, athletes and entertainment celebrities absolutely can play the role of politician.
Second, athletes and celebrities can better tackle with pressure. Specifically, Olympic athletes need to conquer their nervous and stress in case of affects their performance. Moreover, Jay Chow which is a famous celebrity in my country and have been under the pressure of public opinion many years, but he said that “god will never give you anything you cannot handle, so I would not afraid the stress”. Therefore, athletes and celebrities also can deal with the difficult task such like be a politician.
Irrefutably, some people maintain their viewpoint that it is not a wise decision for those athletes and celebrities to change to become politician. For instance, basketball players only expert at basketball area and celebrities such like actors only good at how to amuse audience. However, nobody can value one person’s ability, because people will keep learning things and improving themselves. Hence, if athletes and celebrities change their roads to become a politician, they will have both potential and opportunity to take charge of any political position.
In brief, due to the reasons described above, I am positive that athletes and celebrities can go in for politician and increase all human being’s happiness.
- None of the three theories presented in the reading passage are very convincing.First, the stone balls as hunting weapons, common Neolithic weapons such as arrowheads and hand axes generally show signs of wear, so we should expect that if the stone balls 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Cooperative ability is more important than leadership in today s world 61
- Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school. Others say that children should make these decisions on their own. Which view do you agree with and why? 76
- Some parents do not agree with the way teachers are teaching their children. Do you think that parents should express their disapproval to the teachers? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Many people think that athletes or celebrities that are from the entertainment business can change their careers to be politicians. Do you agree or disagree with this idea of profession change? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrity'.
Suggestion: celebrity
...formance. Moreover, Jay Chow which is a famous celebrity in my country and have been under the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease all human being's happiness.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in brief, kind of, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27728613569 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93637629705 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601769911504 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7321628988 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8125 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327562042142 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109677685307 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612656594866 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170167865444 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614994129767 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.