do you agree or disagree with the statement that
should students take the course taught in a traditional way that teachers speak and student listen or the course that student discuss and talk.
Recently, a new teaching method which students become the center of a class, but teachers keep silent at the most time has been applied in all kinds of schools, from elementary schools to universities. Facing this new method, there are many different opinions in our society. While some citizens believe that teachers should be the central of a class, just like teachers talk and students listen and take notes, while the standpoint of others is that this new teaching method has more advantages than the traditional teaching way. Personally, the latter point, I believe, is more reasonable.
First of all, hardly does a student not participate to class discussions and activities on classes through this method. Normally, professors will give different questions to each different group, and these tasks usually need to be solved by grouping work. In this case, everyone has to participate. For example, our middle has already used this new teaching method for several years. One day, our geology teachers required our group to find causes of volcanos’ formation. Therefore, our group leader separated this question into 6 factors, and then he required each us to choose one of factors to think and share. In this case, each us had to take part in our class. However, in the traditional teaching method, I will never answer questions asked by professors, because that are not required. Obviously, only when students are in this new teaching method can they participate courses more efficiently.
Secondly, it is this new teaching method that helps students focus on courses. From my perspective, lectures talked by teachers usually pretty boring and not understandable. However, ideas shared by our classmates may be more interesting and easy to be understood. For example, one day, our history teacher wanted us to learn the history of New York. Luckily, one of our classmates has been to New York for many times, and he shared his experiences in New York, and some inside structures of famous buildings in New York, which were pretty interesting for us. Therefore, under these backgrounds shared by my classmates, all of us favored to learn the history of New York. Whereas, if our class was based on our history teacher’s lecture, we would not want to pay so much attention on this course, because our teacher might never have been to New York, so he could not provide knowledge as interesting as my classmate, even difficult to understand. Obvious, it is not a statement that this new teaching method is the best way to make students focus on classes.
In conclusion, since this new teaching method can make students participate more efficiently and help students pay attention on courses, hence, I think schools should use this new teaching method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-12 | Bingdong Li | 70 | view |
- no 3
- Do you think honesty is the most important characteristic for a leader 73
- do you agree or disagree with this statement because advertisements are less honest now so people begin to less rely on ads 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people who move out of their hometowns can be more successful than people who stay in their hometowns for a whole a life 73
- do you agree or disagree with the statement students should be required to study basic science to graduate 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ties. Facing this new method, there are many different opinions in our society. While some cit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ld be the central of a class, just like teachers talk and students listen and take notes...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07456140351 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75980024346 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495614035088 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7521689724 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.181818182 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15007106306 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052577169063 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636217458736 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115258783601 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366632286127 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.