Do you agree or disagree with the statement that teachers' performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers?
Teachers have a fundamental role in the society. The evaluation of their performances in the schools can flourish the importance of this role. While some people are convinced that the assessment should be based on the students' performances; others, on the other hand, believe that this comparison should be between the teachers. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first factor which advocates my outlook is that the students' progress is related to factors apart from the teachers' performance in the training process. One of these factors is students' practice or hard work. Indeed, if the student does not practice the information presented in the class, the teacher's whole efforts for the teaching will be abortive. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is my brother's instance. He studies in one of the prestige schools, and his teacher is one the best and informative instructors in our city. Any student for the sake of this elaborated condition should be able to learn the materials comprehensively. However, my brother has some problems, and the majority of these problems is related to his lack of the practice. He does not spend more than two hours for the reviewing and practicing the lessons. In this condition, it is not fair to blame the teacher for the student's shortage for practicing.
The second factor which demonstrates the students' functions are beyond the teachers' performance is that the educational equipment is crucial in the training process. It is evident as a crystal that each training method requires a series of special equipment to convey the subject fluently. For instance, the efficiency of the well-equipped laboratory is undeniable in the understanding of the chemistry. In a case which the school suffers the deficient of the educational facilities, the teachers ‘entire attempts for teaching will be meaningless since the students are not able to examine the subject practically. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-five percent of the teachings based on the practical approach are more useful than the theoretical based instructions.
Nevertheless, some people may assume that the teachers should not evaluate by their co-worker, while the people are not identical in the whole aspects to be able for comparison. They overlook the curious of the evaluation. As the scoop of the evaluation is based on the sensitive and subtle points, the teachers of the same grade are compared. Moreover, as the issues presented by the same grade teachers are equal, there is no any difference between the teachers' efforts in the conveying the subject. This comparison lucidly shows which approach of teaching is more effective than others.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the evaluation of teachers should be among the teachers since the students' performances depend on the other factors such as the hard work and school equipment. All in all, I highly recommend for the improving the teaching system; compare the teachers with their co-workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-17 | Bingdong Li | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-16 | Jerry030907 | 71 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | atoizfake | 60 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | mitra.m | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- tpo46 86
- 1.The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep 55
- tpo52 3
- 1.Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a r 70
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ss is related to factors apart from the teachers performance in the training process. On...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 924, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s not fair to blame the teacher for the students shortage for practicing. The second...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...s the students functions are beyond the teachers performance is that the educational equ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...same grade teachers are equal, there is no any difference between the teachers eff...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'apart from', 'for instance', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.250434782609 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.132173913043 0.158761421928 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0782608695652 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0382608695652 0.046263068375 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0347826086957 0.0685040099705 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133913043478 0.118717715034 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0313043478261 0.0351676179071 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99804405478 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0191304347826 0.0309702414327 62% => OK
Particles: 0.00173913043478 0.00188951952338 92% => OK
Determiners: 0.170434782609 0.0887237588012 192% => Less determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0208695652174 0.0209618222197 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00869565217391 0.0139019557991 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3262.0 2387.08602151 137% => OK
No of words: 523.0 408.028673835 128% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23709369025 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388145315488 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.336520076482 0.251872472559 134% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.260038240918 0.174417080927 149% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162523900574 0.112833075102 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99804405478 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466539196941 0.524397521467 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.4624001896 59.2087087015 92% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1153846154 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5817132985 48.84282405 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 120.699889404 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1153846154 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.576923076923 0.644075263715 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 53.7673922636 45.7405998639 118% => OK
Elegance: 2.02542372881 1.45489161554 139% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264224011273 0.300154397459 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118835451187 0.103427244359 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0849034838571 0.0752933317313 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.599716895745 0.497263757937 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167677122505 0.151897553556 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116834090013 0.114077575197 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655881834887 0.0781384742642 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.657617427313 0.336927656856 195% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0655757508932 0.067059652881 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212609935679 0.210909579961 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284594213641 0.0618886996521 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.