1. Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of prompt adduces that the law should possess the flexibility to show adaptation toward the differences occurred in times, circumstances, and places. This the claim with which I generally do concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs, to rear my standpoint.
The first striking point which should be considered is the intrinsic dynamic feature of circumstances. It is lucidly obvious that the situations over time do not own a constant status; in addition, these variation leads to the difference in the responsible controlling rule of condition. A lucid example which could be given to highlight the issue is the current existed law in Iran with a comparison of its past laws. For the sake of revolution occurred in 1979, there was a crux and particular change and alteration in the circumstance of the society in Iran. The belief of government after the revolution since is based on the Islamic beliefs, more Islamic based rules are implemented in the society which completely vary from the accomplished pre-revolution laws. If the same laws from the past were used in the novel scheme of society, there would be a conflict between the ideology of the regime and utilized laws.
Another equally important issue which should bolded is the alteration of mankind’s attitude over time. It is explicitly apparent that the main aim of establishing the law is controlling the civics and their denizens. Consequently, the rules are shaped for the sake of people; so there should be a cogent and direct link between human beings’ attitude and the appointed rule. On the other hand, the fluctuated pattern of man kind’s attitude toward its surrounding urges the variation of appointed laws too. An instance which could shed spotlights over the topic is the men’s perspective toward the issue of slavery. Previously, owning the slaves by the specified cast of society was an indicator of power and prestige; however, currently, for the sake of people’s modernized ideology, slavery is abolished and considered as an immoral action. Therefore, there is well-defined law which forbids possessing the slaves. Thus, the variation of the norms by mankind requires the updated and accountable laws for trend norms.
The final significant factor is the difference of requests provoked by the geographical location. In fact, each place according to its geographical position demands the specified governing legislation. If a place surrounded by the neighbors which produce the drugs and exported to the neighbor countries, there should be a specified regulation in the border of countries to prevent entrance of the drug. However, this legislation is not applicable to the region which is far away from the drug producer countries.
To wrap it up, according to all aforementioned factors illustrate that the law should have the flexibility to adapt to the variety of norms, geographical and circumstance differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Shreya Nuguri | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | wwwww | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 50 | view |
- TPO53Independent Task-Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy pro 80
- 1.In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the stateme 66
- tpo37-integrated 3
- 31.As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 83
- . Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...graphical and circumstance differences.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29132231405 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08339440398 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526859504132 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7076130112 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.409090909 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202065718706 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058084017172 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384659645546 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10657266358 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037056639743 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.