Do you agree or disagree: The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
Is the dress a good indication of people’s personality and character? Dress sometimes can imply the cultural background, age and preferences of a person, but a certain person with his/her own personality may also dress different types of clothing. Hence, my answer is yes-and-no: dress can indicate some personality of several people but it is not always a true and effective indication.
To begin with, personal tastes, interests and ages sometimes can be inferred from people’s dress. For example, a bunch of my husband’s colleagues who work in IT industry and most of whom are intelligent and anti-social tend to prefer wearing T-shirts and jeans. Whereas, my colleagues who commute in the financial center often dress fancily and stylishly. They spend considerable time on ironing shirts and choosing smart suites and most of them are social and talkative. Thus, dress sometimes can trace the personal taste and profession of certain people. What’s more, a meticulous person can also speculate another's age from their dress. To be more specific, the younger mostly prefer trendy suites and flamboyant apparel while the elder may show greater preferences towards classic suites and low-key luxury. Consequently, dress could be a powerful hint of personal character at some degree.
However, does the dress always tell the complete truth? I doubt so because a certain person in a certain day with a certain personality can dress in totally different styles. Take my own life experience as an example. In the daytime, from 9am to 6pm, I’m working as a management consultant in a skyscraper. I normally wear close-fitting formal dress, which are mostly black, white and grey. Right after 6pm, before I step out the building, I usually change the tight and uncomfortable dress to a relaxed T-shirt with a colorful skirt and then head to meet my friends and have a drink. Then, what is my personality, introverted or extroverted, realistic or romantic, industrious or ingenious? I believe it’s hard to tell only based on the tiny piece of cloth. I even once heard from my client that ‘when I firstly saw you in a professional smart suite with a pair of black-famed glasses, I thought you were a serious and unsmiling person. But after talking and cooperating with you these days, I’m surprised that you are so humorous and vivacious.’ Now you can see, dress as a hint of personality is not always reliable.
As a consequence, if you ask me the aforementioned question, I will argue that the way people dress can be a clue to trace their character. However, it would not be always true and effective. People had better consider other relevant factors, such as languages, articles and origins, before drawing a conclusion or a judgment towards another person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-07 | sara.ana | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | atefe_mollazade | 81 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | atefe_mollazade | 81 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | atefe_mollazade | 81 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | zg1122 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the parents should let children make mistake and let them learn from their own mistake. 90
- Do you agree or disagree The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character 70
- Agree or disagree: people nowadays spend much more time than they should using text messages and new technologies such as social media to communicate with each other. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to smart'
Suggestion: to smart
...ble time on ironing shirts and choosing smart suites and most of them are social and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, whereas, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15754923414 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02547095836 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560175054705 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0560497896 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2083333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0416666667 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276333207828 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806783702311 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889323884026 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19295510126 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914220218079 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.