do you agree or disagree? young people today do no give enough time to help in communities?
Since the end of the last century, the concept of participating young people in helping their communities has been brought to public attention. Some people believe that teenagers nowadays do not have enough time to involve in community services; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts in this belief. From a personal perspective, the former point of view carries more weight, given that children these days are overwhelmed with plenty of tasks, such as studying, working. Below I will strive my supporting points in more detail.
The first and foremost point, young people have been exposed to fierce competition, so they should study hard to improve their grades. A vivid example that can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is, prestigious schools in California need very high-grade point averages to accept students. Provided that high schoolers students want to admit to these schools, they should work as hard as they can to improve their intelligible capacity and achieve their goals. To put it in another way, nowadays young people spend most of their time studying to earn fundamental knowledge, critical thinking and skills to get a lovely career in the future; thus they pull up their future with a lot of thrives and prosperity. Consequently, teenagers do not have enough time to help their communities.
Next, coupled with studying, working is another reason why young people's time is so tight. For instance, children in developed countries are under severe stress, given that they take loans from banks to apply for schools. Provided that they want to earn money for their tuition fees and all other college-related costs, they should work part-time jobs in summer. Although involving early in practical life could teach teenagers to take responsibility, it could make them anxious and exhausted to do volunteer works for their communities.
Although the previous reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at a glance, they are not the only reasons available. There is another subtle point that must be born in mind. The technological invention, such as the internet, attracts teenagers. Most of the children who access the world web have social media accounts either on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. A recent survey conducted by The University of Toronto found that young people nowadays communicate with their friends through the internet by chatting or by means of comments, likes or share more than communicate with people in their communities. Therefore, internet invention has influenced participating in communities' activity negatively.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, young people today do not have enough time to help their communities. It is suggested that schools design learning activities to encourage students to involve in volunteer work for their societies.
�` ���%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | Christine hanna | 90 | view |
- tpo 28 71
- workers who do several tasks doing the workdays are more satisfied than those who do similar tasks all day long? 81
- tpo 43 3
- do you agree or disagree? employees should work fast and risk doing mistakes rather than work slowly and make sure everything is correct? 76
- tpo 50 mission to Mars 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n volunteer work for their societies. �'���%
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34354485777 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88462387927 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564551422319 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5027156192 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7619047619 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203430480681 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677992003347 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961778216982 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113482595044 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078352262453 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.