Do you agree or disagree?Media are less concerned about the accuracy of news in compared with the past.
The question is whether Media are less concerned about the accuracy of news in compared with the past or not. Everyone with regard to his perspective may maintain a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that TV, Radio or internet are not reliable and sometimes they can deceive human beings with wrong news while others have a conviction that media acts more precise than past and the correlation staff know that any error in news can create destructive consequences. I am unanimous with the latter group; so the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through two salient reasons:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that today's technology has kept marching forward and it has provided the condition for people to access to up-dated news as soon as possible. There are plentiful of tools such as satellites, high-speed internet, computers and cell-phones and so on which assist community in achieving the mentioned goal. In the past eras, unpleasant events like earthquakes, floods or avalanches could have not been reported quickly because there were not enough devices for notifying; hence, a large number of people lost their live until rescue forces arrived. Yet, nowadays, since communities are able to receive the news fast and without flaws; therefore, the equipped helicopters or vehicles with the newest medical facilities can be sent to destroyed areas. It can be said that the average of death or injury will be reduced in this way.
In addition, the economics of every country depends on the global price of oil, gold, dollar and euro and list goes on. Businessmen, traders and investors need to be aware of any change in global marketing. It goes without saying that a society will develop only when its different types of industries prosper in financial fields. If a businessman does not know the last price of gold or oil in world, their investment may fail and consequently this occurrence will have negative impacts on the country's economics, so the governments must warn media about the validity of news. Meanwhile, political issues such as war, producing nuclear energy and or politic deductions require a high level of accuracy. A mistake or inaccuracy in expressing news may mislead the leaders or armies of other countries and it will cause the war to be started among the world.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that today's TV, Radio or internet emphasize that news should be reported fast with high accuracy because any mistake may lead the country toward irrecoverable damages such as financial fails or increasing of death.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-14 | peerless alex | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...h, nobody could overlook this fact that todays technology has kept marching forward an...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ot enough devices for notifying; hence, a large number of people lost their live until rescue for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08372093023 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65578544358 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606976744186 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1573164916 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.733333333 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200374147284 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072781803197 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137478839225 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125441680389 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104225369997 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.