do you agree or disagree?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.

Quality of education is an important factor that affects universities ranking. Although some people believe that to improve education quality we should increase professor's salaries, my opinion is that it will not have the expected result. In my view, other main elements have more effect and university professors need other things besides salary to offer higher quality education.

A university consists of different elements that each element should work properly to system provide a good educational environment. Professors are only one element in the system and other factors like university teaching technique, students performance and university facilities are all have their influence on education quality. Without a modern teaching technique that involve students in subjects, a professor cannot convey information to their students. For example, I had problems in learning mathematics in university but after my university recruit a new professor in mathematics, he could solve my problems. That happened because he was a young professor with a new method who has an entry-level salary. In addition, when students are not enthusiastic enough to learn new material, there will be no good feedback on education quality. Finally, when the university does not have adequate education facility such as laboratories student cannot learn what they taught in the classrooms.

On the other hand, spending more money on professor's salary only increase their individual satisfaction. However, professors actually need more research budget so they can expand their research activities and as a result, can attract talented students to the university. Without this budget, professors have no other option than reducing practical research and stick to simulations which reduces student understanding on their specialty. For example, students who study basic physical particles need special labs to study these basic particles or a person who study languages should have access to a good language laboratory to practice. So, it seems other factors have a more prominent effect on education quality than professor's salaries.

It is my understanding that professor's salary plays a small part in education quality and other factors such as education method, students, and university facilities can have a more promising effect on quality of education.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... the other hand, spending more money on professors salary only increase their individual s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...alaries. It is my understanding that professors salary plays a small part in education ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, finally, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64406779661 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95168408783 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522598870056 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8418266821 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217054553231 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829450884705 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665640812667 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161401672226 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522319840819 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.