Eating at home VS eating outside.
Responding to this statement “eating at home or eating outside”, most people would claim: who has time, energy, endurance, and mainly the mood to spend hours cooking, while I can eat outside. However, regardless of these understandable claims, I strongly prefer to eat at home for the following reasons.
I believe in the saying “home is sweet home”. It is certainly called so because it represents that mouthwatering food which you would never taste like even in the fanciest restaurants in all over the world. Undoubtedly, homemade food might be simple lacks that artistic presentation made by those talented cuisine chefs, but it is special because it is made and served with love. To my mind, food goes beyond its physical meaning. Eating at home keeps that unique bond between people and their homes. For example, it is so common to hear from people who live thousands miles away from their families that they miss their moms, grandma’s, or wives` cooking, simply because they had been fed love not just food.
Eating outside, people are not aware of what they are eating. When people go to restaurant, they are given a menu to choose from what they would like to eat. To illustrate, if you choose to eat ``Alfredo Shrimp` `in Olive Garden restaurant, the menu tells you what kind of ingredients are used for this specific dish: shrimp, tomato sauce, garlic, cheese, and basil. However, does this menu say everything about this dish? No, it does not say it all. To be more specific, it does not tell if it is a frozen or wild caught shrimp, fresh or just canned tomato, nor the kind of cheese is being used; these details should be included in the menu because some people have allergies, or they just prefer to eat organic natural ingredients. That’s why people feel sick after a having a dinner outside, and end up in the emergency room paying triple fee of that dinner, and maybe missing some work days. For these reasons, I believe food in restaurants is a mystery, their menu conceals more than what they reveals.
Eating at home has several advantages: it elevate that sense of belonging to your home, it strengthen that healthy bond between family members, and finally you are eating healthy food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Responding to this statement 'eatin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t at home for the following reasons. I believe in the saying 'home is sw...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1025, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'reveal'
Suggestion: reveal
...their menu conceals more than what they reveals. Eating at home has several advantag...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'elevates'?
Suggestion: elevates
...ting at home has several advantages: it elevate that sense of belonging to your home, i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'strengthens'?
Suggestion: strengthens
...hat sense of belonging to your home, it strengthen that healthy bond between family member...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95811518325 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7235851695 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1577430169 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.411764706 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280710770282 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107216195675 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128064611913 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239398574068 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131059705796 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.