In general, people are living longer now. Which of the following do you think is the main cause of this phenomenon?
• Technological improvements
• Changes to education systems
• Improvements to our diets
Everything in this life-like a coin that has two different sides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to the conclusions. Many individual may believe that the development of some technological devices could be the reason behind long living. Whereas, others could agree that some changes to education system or improvement of people diets habits may be the reasons of that phenomenon. In my humble opinion, I agree that technological improvement would be the most practical option for the following reasons.
First and foremost, majority of people would agree with the notion that kinds of invention should be considered the most essential aspect of our lives all around the globe. Due to the fact that nowadays technology influences our lives in a direct and intangible way. Additionally, in this era many surveys claimed that the ratio of people who’s living at age of eighty increased by around sixty percentages because of interventional devices provided by hospitals which lead to live for too long.
On top of this, people now live longer that our ancestors. According to the one of the important factors is the technological improvement; it could allow physicians to find out the diseased area before any diffusion to other organs. Moreover, surgeons are able to save people’s lives by doing many surgeries on a patient within short periods due to many differential diagnoses prior to surgeries which could be supported by technological devices. For instance, researchers looked at birth and death data for people above age 65. To illustrate more thoroughly, they found out that people expected to live about six years longer than their grandparents, on average.
Additionally, to give a clear explanation about other factors, in my standpoint, I don’t agree that changing the education system could allow persons to live for long. Furthermore, people can study science besides math and still not ware enough about living healthy and longer. However, being on a healthy diet could change individual wellness. But, they still can’t live longer than people in years ago even if they are on a healthy diet.
In summation, I strongly believe that in these couple of centuries people can live longer than others in the past due to technological development. According to plethora of technological devices which affect many patients and other healthy individuals in positively way, for facing the dilemma of quick death and short life span in many countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Malaak | 92 | view |
- In this fast growing world, industrialization and educational advancement have taken a major role. Considering learning plays a significant role in our life so, everyone has to put the effort to raise the standard educational system. As far as I concerned 60
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- What is a very important skill a person should learn in order to be successful in the world today Choose one skill and use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 87
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engin 80
- There is no shortage of opinion on (paraphrase the question topic). In my opinion, (your stance on the topic). I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.First of all, (first reason for your opinion). (1-3 sente 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much individual may', 'a good deal of individual may'.
Suggestion: Much individual may; A good deal of individual may
...cons before jumping to the conclusions. Many individual may believe that the development of some te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91107797903 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6872102758 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305086162078 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101430728396 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700275394615 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163836265636 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371786899059 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.