government action can solve housing shortages in big cities.
“providing adequate housing was a thorny issue for Britain government in Northeastern of the United States” Tara Westover, An illustrated history of USA, 2017. In big cities, id government solve the housing shortage or not is a complex situation. As far as I am concerned, it needs a great collaboration between citizens and governments, however, it seems that government’s role is undeniable. In the following, I am inclined to put forth some arguments to support the position.
First and foremost, no prize for guessing that government takes a center stage in facilitating the housing building or even purchasing. In fact, governments provide some conveniences to promote house buildings, especially in big cities. For instance, they can provide adequate primitive building materials, as well as, financial supports for vernacular people to tackle housing shortages. This process not only concrete the relationships between government and people, but also it helps people to use their own design in housing. Thus, by providing materials and financial supports, housing shortage can be addressed effectively.
Another thing coming to the mind is that by improving financial conditions, governments will promote house building indirectly. As an illustrated case, according to the SCI, Statistics Center of Iran, the financial condition has a great influence on Iranian people to buy or build houses. Indeed, the people are just thinking about their primitive needs such as foods and clothes not buying or making their own houses. Hence, it seems fair to conclude that by amending financial problems, which can be improved by governments, housing shortage can be solved.
Last but not least, in some cases, governments should build houses for people. Because of this fact that the final prices of such houses are not comparable with private houses, people are willing to buy them. As well as, this process can solve other related problems, too. For example, by building such houses, governments are responsible to build schools, medical centers, parks, libraries, and other places. As a result, it augments people’s access to various conveniences as well as a house. Furthermore, it can increase the local jobs and consequently reduces unemployment.
In conclusion, although some people believe that governments should not involve in housing building, others repudiate the idea. As far as I know, the involvement can address housing shortage effectively. Furthermore, it helps people to use relevant facilities. If governments had involved in housing problems, big cities would have not encountered with the housing shortage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
- what is a very important skill a person should learn? 73
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 80
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest that th 80
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of 73
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, another thing, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54567901235 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12183532792 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535802469136 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9165381335 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.652173913 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6086956522 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4347826087 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369711803779 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115993167452 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122045146916 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220298779412 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613933172572 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.