government should pay money on supporting arts or athletics
From a general standpoint, governments own a huge amount of investments that should be spent on different aspects of issues regarded to a country. which issue the bidget should be spent on is very important because it can determine the quality of that country. While some people believe that spending money on the arts is preferred to supporting athletics, I am personally inclined to believe that spending money on athletics is more important. In the following, I will try to aptly pinpoint the most outstanding reasons to advocate my viewpoint.
The first reason leading credence to the argument is that spending a great proportion of the budget on the athletics can encourage people to pay more attention to sport. In fact, this can indirectly prompt more interest for sport in the society and people will allocate more time and effort to sport. A healthy society is dependent on the more athlete people and more support and interest for sport. A personal example of mine may provide sufficient proof to my claim. When I was ten years old, Olympic games was held and I could see that how they were supported even financially or sentimentally by government and people. Hence, the sense of pride and acceptance that they felt, prompted me pay more attention to sport and choose a field in sport to continue. As a result, the fit and healthy body that I have now is because of the interest created in me in those days.
Moreover, athletics is one of the most important items of culture and governments by supporting them are supporting the culture of the country. Some sports are originally stated from some specific countries and people remember that country by hearing the name of a specific sport or game. Without the shadow of doubt, government shoulders the responsibility of preserving the name and the fame of that sport
Take the brazil for instance, as it is obvious when we hear the name of brazil, football games come to our mind. There for, government should allocate a notably amount of money to preserve this heritage that determines the identity of brazil.
In conclusion, bearing the forgoing points and examples in mind, I am of the opinion that it is better that countries assign more money to advocate athletics than art. This is because this leads to bolding sport in the society and it will cause more interest in sport and consequently, a healthier society. Additionally, sport is among the cultural items of the country and this heritage needs money to survive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
- possible reason of extinction at the end of Triassic 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 90
- purpose of the cave paintings of Lascaux 73
- frog population decline 80
- sea otter population decrease 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...spects of issues regarded to a country. which issue the bidget should be spent on is ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 152, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('notably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('amount') instead of another adjective.
.... There for, government should allocate a notably amount of money to preserve this heritage that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90801886792 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71944394243 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47641509434 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3768427899 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272647148688 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804930586392 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794253352187 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145157384399 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503872554953 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.