governments should improve internet access or public transportation
In the last three decades, the governments' funds have become controversial debates. Some people believe that governments should allocate more money to improve internet access; however, there is another substantial body of evidence claims that addressing more money in public transportation is way more important. From a personal perspective, assigning more money to enhance the internet access is more crucial given that the internet plays a vital role in education, communication and transportation. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The first and foremost point, recently, the internet has become essential for education, which has a positive impact on potential learning outcomes. For instance, schools in developed countries, such as Canada and the US, have started to design learning activities on the internet, which promotes students' fundamental knowledge and amplifies their intelligible capacity. In addition to that, university students use the internet to do research and study. Furthermore, provided that people work or married, they would be tight on time. The internet could be another way to study through online-courses, which is flexible on time. Consequently, accessibility to the internet is essential for everyone in a community.
Next, coupled with proper education, transportation is another benefit for the easy accessibility to the internet. For instance, throughout the internet, people could use data connection ability, such as GPS to navigate their destination, so they could get where they want to go. Moreover, people could use apps, such as Google Maps to know the traffic condition and find out the best routes; thus, they could save time and gas. To put it in other words, when governments put more funds on the internet, they could also improve transportation. Therefore, allocating money on internet access could simplify people's lives.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, it is more important for governments to improve internet access because that could enhance not only education, but also transportation. It is suggested that governments compromise to distribute their funds evenly between the internet and public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 72
- tpo 14 salvage logging benefits 75
- tpo 30 70
- tpo 45 the fossilized bee nests 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific details and examples to support your answer.Students should choose a university that prepares them for high paying careers. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the internet and public transportation.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65970149254 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16125745148 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546268656716 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0233680096 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.529411765 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350736706396 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11268933119 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935339870264 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224728267052 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762977748341 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.