To help the first year students adapt to new college life, university has two plans. One is to offer a week orientation . The other is to ask to the freshman to meet with their senior year schoolmates regularly. According to your opinions, which plan is better?
Each university or college decide variety plans for their freshmen to adapt to their school. While some school chooses the strategy to hold a week orientation for new students, some inquire their freshmen to meet their senior year schoolmates constantly. Nowadays, these ideas are so controversial. In my view, university or college should plan to ask the freshman to make contact with their senior year students regularly. These opportunities are so beneficial for new students to gain real school life, not spend a waste of time by a week orientation, and achieve more variety aged friends.
First, students are able to acquire the basements of their real school life. The students who spend their school life for more than one year have the knowledge of how to conveniently manage their classes, clubs, and dormitories. For instance, one new freshman does not know exactly what classes he does not feel boring. One day, he had the situation to ask his senior schoolmate who had the same major compared with his. Thus, the friend advises him that he should take one of the most intriguing lectures.
Secondly, it is a waste of time for the freshmen to spend one-week orientation. They can use their time more flexible instead of orientation. For example, some students have to take their time for their homework of lectures in college and university. If they miss exactly the deadline for the homework and do not have enough time to concentrate on the homework, their grade will gradually fall down. As a result, it is so hard for them to earn sufficient money and live comfortably in the future. Therefore, schools should not establish the orientation based on a week for their future.
Finally, freshmen can have opportunities to acquire diverse aged friends from senior students. Their ideas will be limited if students only have friends who also are freshmen. Take myself as an example, I hanged out with friends who are the same age as me when I started my new school life at university. One day, I came up with the ideas that I applied to the staff for the festival held at my university. Therefore, I had more situations to contact with the mature students who are older than me. This time was so unforgettable memories for me because one of the staff gave me the ideas that I decided to go to study abroad.
To sum up, I surely believe that university and college take freshman opportunities to contact with senior mates constantly. Freshmen can absorb exactly school life from senior students, use their time more flexibly, and gain wide aged friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-24 | akimasa7887 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older 66
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 68
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 66
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 4 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 50
- When working on creative work do you prefer to be in a team or do you prefer to work alone which do you prefer and why 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87899543379 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67669211492 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454337899543 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5584310516 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0416666667 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270095400525 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862960000737 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783166771485 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170081882095 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962037707721 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.