How Segways replace bicycles?
Since the modern bicycles were invented by England engineers, most people are using bicycles for transportation, sport, enjoying, etc. This technology is to help the health conditions of riders. Riding a bicycle helps people to minimize their sicknesses such as getting fat, depression, mental illnesses, etc. Pedaling a bicycle strengths the feet power. Individuals who are using this revolutionary vehicle are getting more and more day bye day.
In many countries, the governments are making specific lanes for bicycle riders. They say that the bicycle is a technology which doesn't create any environmental pollution around the cities. They are encouraging the people to use the bicycle instead of cars, motorcycles, etc.
Subsequent revolutionary vehicle which has been invented by working of many educated individuals is Segway. Segway was invented in 2001 while most people were using earlier modern bicycles. Inventors of Segway believe that the Segway will be a substitution for bicycles in not too distance future.
They claim that substitution of Segways instead of bicycles can minimize the injuries people get from riding a bicycle.
As the inventors say, the Segway is way too different from the bicycles. It doesn't need a lot of energy to move forward. When a rider wants to move forward, he can easily lean forward and Segway starts going forward. If he wants to make a stop, he leans back and the Segway stops going.
The Segway has an electronic framework which works automatically. It includes a platform with rubber wheels, a handle bar, strong tires, and director switches.
A Segway cannot be compared to a bicycle. The bicycles can go far, but a Segway can only move about 30 kilometers. The acceleration of bicycles is dependent on rider's energy. If any rider has enough energy, he can pedal more than 45 kilometers per hour. In Segways it is impossible because they haven't been made for long travels. They are to be used just for short activities such as going to bazaar, patrolling the buildings by police officer, going to jobs, etc.
Finally, revolution of new technologies can increase fundamental improvements of people. Worldwide, people are using from the least possibilities to create highest alterations.
- Do you agree or disagree?life is more happy now or in the past? 70
- A person you know is planning to move to your city town. What do you think this person would like and dislike about living in your town or city? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following examples It s good to study abroad than studying home 63
- How Segways replace bicycles 83
Comments
When you talk about this…
When you talk about this issue, a thought popped into my head "I finally found a partner", kogama squid is the most popular dribbling game right now, I'm happy if we both Let's play together and discuss more about the above problem
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... that the bicycle is a technology which doesnt create any environmental pollution arou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cycle instead of cars, motorcycles, etc. Subsequent revolutionary vehicle which h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to distance'?
Suggestion: to distance
...l be a substitution for bicycles in not too distance future. They claim that substitutio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or bicycles in not too distance future. They claim that substitution of Segways ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uries people get from riding a bicycle. As the inventors say, the Segway is way ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...way too different from the bicycles. It doesnt need a lot of energy to move forward. W...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'riders'' or 'rider's'?
Suggestion: riders'; rider's
...cceleration of bicycles is dependent on riders energy. If any rider has enough energy,...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...n Segways it is impossible because they havent been made for long travels. They are to...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s by police officer, going to jobs, etc. Finally, revolution of new technologies ...
^^^^
Line 15, column 150, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'create the highest'.
Suggestion: create the highest
...e using from the least possibilities to create highest alterations.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24376731302 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88402503227 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548476454294 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8879144169 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.8076923077 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8846153846 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.23076923077 5.45110844103 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258371896466 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782218958743 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646824570913 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12255474544 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645459944515 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.