Last winter, I joined in the international volunteer activity to recycle the waste in a forest in Marburg, German to protect the environment. My team collected the rubbish, such as bottles and cans, and then sent them to the recycle center. Every vacation, volunteers from all around the world would come here to devote themselves to recycling the waste to contribute to the environment of the world. Based on my own experience, I propose that recycling the waste is the best way if people want to contribute to the society.
First, recycling the waste could lead to a great improvement in waste management. This activity is so easy that every people could do it effective. Thus, the measure could be implemented in the common public. Strength in numbers. The waste management problem could be eased to the largest extent. In this way, people can contribute to improve the environment. Let’s turn to the aforementioned example. Decades of years earlier, the forest in Marbury was polluted severely because the industrial waste were stored there. Through the effort of the citizens and the volunteers from all over the world, such as garbage classification and recycle the waste, the forest now has been energetic again. When we were doing the volunteer job, we picked up the sticks and some apple cores to the ‘unrecyclable rubbish’ and the drink bottles to the ‘recyclable rubbish’. After our two weeks’ effort, the forest environment was improved dramatically. Thus, I claim that people could protect the environment if they recycle the waste.
Second, the recycle waste could be transformed to other useful things and reuse again. If people recycle the waste to a certain scale, the rubbish could be transformed to some industrial products, such as raw materials and plastic. In this way, the rubbish could be reuse again. And people could contribute to the social productivity indirectly. My own experience exemplifies the statement sufficiently. When I was in the university, I joint an environmental protect club named ‘Better Planet’ and I would collect the rubbish by the seaside, then send it to the recycle center every weekend. After four years, the recycle center gave me a certificate which said that my usable selected waste reached 200 kilograms and it had been transformed to 30 kilograms various of industrial raw materials. If people in the society want to contribute to the social productivity, I could probably tell that joining to recycle the waste is a good way.
On contrast, riding bicycle or walking on foot is not practical. People are busy undergoing the fast-paced times. Without driving a car, the effectiveness of transport would be much lower. Moreover, it is unrealistic that advocating most people to buy local organic food. Inevitably, it would add their economic pressure because the organic food is more expensive than the common ones. Hence, the two kinds of behaviors both run counter with contributing to the society.
Based on the discussions above, it is reasonable to believe that recycling the waste is the best way to contribute the society. Because it could increase the waste management and enhance the society productivity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, then, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2704.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21001926782 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03554258834 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487475915222 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.9 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7498224428 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.21875 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.45110844103 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24721234482 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677652322521 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792824825816 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15733307136 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572003671299 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.