If the school asks you to do a task that requires creativity, do you prefer working alone or working a group?
Dealing with mission which requires creativity, people resort to multiple ways to achieve a satisfying goal. Some contend that working by oneself can leave them space to figure out the solution more effectively. However, I am convinced that team work can yield more fruits.
Working with others forces people to step outside the comfort zone, thus creating more possibilities to generate innovative ideas. In most cases, individuals have their own set of behavioral pattern formed through long period of time. In other words, we are accustomed to falling into the stereotype due to the experience that is supposed to shorten the thinking time in face of familiar tasks. However, with zero tolerance of ordinary thoughts, the work demanding creative thinking is just the opposite. Being creative means thinking outside the box, which can be hardly triggered when working alone. Team work can be deemed as a process in which every member plays the role of both a supervisor and a co-worker or assistant. When one of them attempts to routinely tackle the problem, others may pinpoint the inadequacy and drive you to ameliorate the original plan. This process can be repeated for several times, which is a perfect illustration of how a team polishes a creative piece of work. For instance, 78% of the designers working for the global luxury brand, Chanel, claim that they have the thought of surrendering to the convential design just to get the job done at least once. One of the respondents, Elise, says it is the existence of partners that urges her to constantly challenge the predictable and to come up with something new.
Collective wisdom shows its significance and efficiency when searching for novelty. Delving into a creative project, people can draw inspiration from other team members, who have various background and all sorts of experiences. We can tap into creativity by gaining clues maybe from the conversation and discussion between teammates. Some unexpected sparks can appear while exchanging thoughts. For example, when one mentions his horse-riding experience, which he sees as casual chitchats, it can be transferred into a pattern representing courage that can be employed in a theme project. The reason why this happens a lot is that a third-person angle provides a new perspective on certain issue. On the contrary, if you are the only person that you can depend on, it will be slower for you to figure out how to obtain the inspiration since one’s surrounding is limited for sure. Even worse, you will probably miss the source of inspiration, which is fatal regarding tasks involving creativity.
In conclusion, working in a group with supervison from teammates and various thoughts brought by them can augment the chance of poping out of innovative ideas so as to finish the task smoothly. Therefore, I firmly believe that team work is a better option.
- Ambitious dreams or realistic dreams 73
- It is a waste of money for governments fund to space travel or space exploration 64
- It is better to spend money on traveling than save money for the future 90
- Children should spend most of the tie playing and studying, and they should not be required to do household chores, like cooking or cleaning. 73
- What is the most important factor affecting the lasting time of a friendship 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... behavioral pattern formed through long period of time. In other words, we are accustomed to f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1000, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l regarding tasks involving creativity. In conclusion, working in a group with s...
^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hance of poping out of innovative ideas so as to finish the task smoothly. Therefore, I ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, third, thus, while, as to, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in most cases, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10147991543 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8330093716 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587737843552 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5204795475 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.913043478 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.34782608696 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167775454529 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481416885909 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443133599435 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114358990712 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189285725751 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.