if universities are given financial support to develop researches, which one do you think would receive more benefits?
a) To predict weather more accurately
b) To clean rivers and ocean
c) To deal with outer space
Nowadays, universities have various programs in which they invest in order to thrive different aspects of people's lives. In this regard, there are always many arguments among senior university officials about which aspect is more crucial than others; weather forecast, river clean up program, search of outer space. Some university officials believe that universities should pay more attention to cleaning rivers and oceans which are the largest ecosystem on earth. However, while protecting seas from unpleasant situations such as pollution is ecologically important, I think university activities must essentially revolve around precise weather forecast because exact weather prediction can help farmers to increase their productions. Also, it prevents major damage caused by natural disasters such as flood. I will elaborate on my reasons in following paragraphs.
First and foremost, agricultural is inherently sensitive to climate conditions. crop growth, or crop yield requires appropriate amounts of moisture, light and temperature. Detailed and accurate weather information can help farmers better understand and track the growth status to make informed decisions. Having access to this data can guide farmers in making significant and potentially costly decisions. Irrigation planning is a good example. If a farmer relies on a forecast for precipitation, that turns out to be accurate, he saves the cost of unnecessary irrigation. And by having a good idea of the expected amount of rain over a period and irrigating just enough to allow crops to thrive, he will maximize his yield.
Secondly, one of the initiatives for crisis management could be enhancement of the capability of long-range forecasts. For example, more specifically for flooding, water sensor networks and advanced weather radar stations could help forecast extreme weather, giving communities more time to prepare. So forecasts, early warning systems and effective national weather services play an essential role in protecting local communities from weather and climate impacts such as flood.
In conclusion, I strongly believe in the importance of weather forecast. By precise weather prediction, farmers could increase their harvest, and people could prepare themselves for extreme weather.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-06 | ghazalsaed1995 | 81 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | ghazalsaed1995 | 81 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | ghazalsaed1995 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- If the government wants to invest in the following three areas, what do you think is the most worthwhile? land exploration, education, and healthcare. 28
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment. 75
- "We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more stu 35
- Human presence on Venus 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Crop
...rently sensitive to climate conditions. crop growth, or crop yield requires appropri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79166666667 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93885510549 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.524837075471 127% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.215626702 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179997318854 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470737564436 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639150057664 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100605421398 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816657133169 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.