If you were given a short period of time to learn something, what would you
choose:
1. learn to play a new sport you never played
2. learn to cook food in a different way
3. learn to do some hand-made work like clothes
Some people prefer learning how to play a new sport given a relatively short period of time. Others like to learn how to cook food in different ways using that period. Still others enjoy doing hand-made work like clothes. For me, I prefer to pick up a new sport whenever I have short period of free time. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, if I had a short period of time, I need to learn things quickly and efficiently, and learning a new sport is way faster than learning how to cook for me. For example, my PE teacher often taught us his self-invented sports and exercises. I am gifted in sports, so I could often identify some strategies really fast. Also, I am able to spot some tiny loopholes and exploit them in some sport rule. Thus, I remembered that I learned the rules and techniques in less than 10 minutes. On the contrary, my dad once educated me on how to cook fried chicken and French-fries. Unfortunately, I had no sense in culinary at all, so I spent more than a month merely learning how to turn on the gas and spread some oils on the pan. Clearly, I can learn a new sport more efficiently than procuring cooking techniques.
In addition, learning new things in a short amount of time requires carelessness, or one might injured himself seriously. Nonetheless, I am not a careless person, so I often got injured when I was learning how to cook. For instance, when I was 15 years old, my mother taught me how to cook bacon, scrambled egg, and macaroni and cheese. Nonetheless, since I was clumsy, I frequently burnt my hand or face accidentally. I remembered once I was even sent to the hospital. On the other hand, I had talents in sports. That is, I had never gotten injured playing basketball or badminton for once. Hence, I have confidence that if I tried new sports, I would not have injured myself.
Last but not least, acquiring new skills in an extremely short period of time needs motivation. Yet, I had no interest in weaving hand-made clothes at all, so I often failed to learn how to do hand-made work. To elaborate, when I was studying in my university, I once took a course called “Introduction to modern fashion industry”. My teacher required me to weave a fashionable gown for the final project in less than 3 days. However, I thought that weaving gowns was extremely tiresome because I was barely thinking nothing during the process. I felt exceptionally painful and miserable when I was doing my final project, so I remembered literally nothing from the course. On the other hand, I like to move and exercise, so learning new sports is a joy instead of an agony for me. Since I have motivation in acquiring new sports, I can usually pick up new sports quickly.
In conclusion, I will undoubtedly choose to learn new sports if I had a short amount of time. This is because I maintain that in order to learn things in a short time, one must learn the concepts quickly, do the activity carelessly, as well as had enough motivation.
- Some companies decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending mails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great Others believe that this policy will discourage employees What is your opinion and why 88
- In modern society when interviewers interview candidates sometimes they use other sources to get information of the candidates Which of the following do you think is a better solution 1 Talk to the former boss of the candidate 2 Check the online profile o 73
- It is more important to use your own knowledge and experience than ask others knowledge and experience to solve problems 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- The government has enough money to fund one of the following choices to improve younger children s education Which do you think is most effective 1 hire more teachers so that each class has fewer students 2 Let children age 3 4 to go to preschool before e 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ay a new sport given a relatively short period of time. Others like to learn how to cook food ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...od in different ways using that period. Still others enjoy doing hand-made work like ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ows. To begin with, if I had a short period of time, I need to learn things quickly and eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...uiring new skills in an extremely short period of time needs motivation. Yet, I had no interes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2453.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 538.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5594795539 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78008574382 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475836431227 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 28.0 9.59856630824 292% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1431825298 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1290322581 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3548387097 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16129032258 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371562914389 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103545444813 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103010536057 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2494353228 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910527654612 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.