Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Mistakes are the best way to learn. In other words, people learn more from their mistakes than their success. Personally, I believe that the best thing to do in such a condition would be to interrupt the meeting or class and correct them right away. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, correcting the mistake right away in presence of everyone will make sure that everyone in the meeting or class will get the correct information and no one will leave the event with incorrect or partial information. If the students were to receive wrong information from the teacher then, they might interpret what they studied in the wrong way and might even share mistakes with their colleagues. Similarly, if the boss at a meeting were to share wrong information, then the employees might have a wrong view of the discussion and the chain of events led by the flow of wrong information might be catastrophic for the organization. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. At one time, a teacher of mine mistakenly interpreted a theory in the wrong way. I had studied the theory myself so I corrected him in front of the class because of which the teacher was able to correct his mistake and everyone learnt the correct theory.
Secondly, Correcting the person in front of everyone prevents a waste time later on when a lot of students might try to meet the teacher for correcting the same mistake. I cannot be sure that I will be the only one to realize the mistake. If a lot of students or employees get the mistake, they might try to meet the teacher or their boss after the event at different time and waste a lot of time of the teacher. Instead of this, if one of the person at the meet corrects the mistake, then it is not necessary to meet the teacher or the boss individually. For instance, we can usually find a lot of students surrounding the teacher for the same thing which could have been said at the meeting or class.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is better to correct the mistakes in front of everyone. This is because it allows everyone to have the same information, and also, it prevents a further waste of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacter 66
- Since those issues of Newsbeat magazine that featured political news on their front cover were the poorest-selling issues over the past three years, the publisher of Newsbeat has recommended that the magazine curtail its emphasis on politics to focus more 66
- Claim The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Reason Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea Write a respo 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54135338346 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60214835481 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423558897243 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.961387935 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.588235294 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27673904768 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967720873688 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863196265542 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170800879804 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706676734775 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.