Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The misunderstanding or making some flaws during a meeting is inevitable since the presenters are under pressure when converting their ideas. As an attendee or student we can reply to incorrect information in several ways such as interrupt and correct immediately or do nothing. From my perspective, people should spend the last minutes in the meeting with the presenter to discuss since it shows the respect of the meeting and more comfortable to correct the information.
To begin with, keeping silent during other’s speaking errors shows respect to the meeting leader and ensures their storyline to other participants. To be more accurate, in order to make a good presentation, people have to put a myriad of effort into finding the resources and preparation; therefore, should a mistake occur, which is unpredictable, keeping silent is the reasonable choice to protect their attempt and their self-respect in front of a group of people. Furthermore, when we interrupt the information, the presenter is absolutely confused about their talking as they will think about it leading to the distraction in their main points. As a result, the presentation will continue to make more mistakes inasmuch as the presenter does not concentrate on their idea. For example, in my school’s project about science class, when a student is having a talk about the particular problem with my class; at first, the conversation following the narrative really incredible, however, one of people in the group shout out to point the missing point which make him, the presenter, feel embarrassed and cannot keep going the interesting concept.
Moreover, face to face conversation with the presenter at the end of the meeting will have time to solve the misunderstanding in the meeting and let the presenter recognize it more easily. This is because finishing the conversation makes the meeting host feel more relaxed so they can be aware enough to receive the feedback; hence, listening to our opinion about the presentation is able to help them to realize the situation and fix the point for the next time. In addition, they will apologize for their mistakes which will never happen during the meeting because of self-respect. Take my class for an example, when the teacher was talking about a phenomenon in science, my seatmeat cut down the line and fixed the teacher point. At that moment, he did not rethink again and insisted that he was right resulting in the conflict between him and the student. Thus, the class was joining into the stress debate which drove the goal in that lecture.
In the end, we have a flexible solution to fix the incorrect point in the meeting but being patient to the last minute will be more beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Leader comes naturally Do you agree with this statement 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 76
- Today students are more interested in politics than the past Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mfortable to correct the information. To begin with, keeping silent during oth...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t keep going the interesting concept. Moreover, face to face conversation with...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which drove the goal in that lecture. In the end, we have a flexible solution ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... last minute will be more beneficial.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06208425721 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86955141064 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507760532151 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.3297700328 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.2 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0666666667 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.45110844103 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191833907417 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707801957833 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384413467053 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12990103457 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446659679055 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.