Nowadays, planning to a vacation is a difficult activity for people; therefore, they try to have a plan for this activity. There are many blind points for people how they can achieve to the situation which planned.
Some people think that friends and family are always reliable to ask them about their vacation, but I think reading online is better for two reasons. First, online articles give us a more useful point; in addition, it is accessible in many situations currently. However, if I can rely on someone who visited a place, may ask him or her.
First of all, online articles give us more details about the places which they want to trip. There are many web pages and articles about many places in the world to give us useful information about them such as direction, cost, history and etc. These materials make the trip easy for people because these are up to date and refresh every day. Thus, I believe that online articles are more reliable.
Secondly, online materials seem accessible in most time. Nowadays, people can access the internet in various places such as mountain, sea, desert, and etc. Moreover, the internet is accessible in many situations such as when we cannot have any access to others; and we won't reach to our questions about some places immediately; and when we are in the path of intended places.
Finally, we should be precise about some wrong data included in the online articles. As mentioned in the introduction paragraph, if I can have access to someone who visited a specific place which I want to go and can make trust about him or her; immediately, I contact with him or her and ask his opinion about that place.
Sum up, some advantages about giving information about places from the online reading are introduced. Firstly, I discuss some useful points about these materials. Secondly, attend to the internet accessibility currently.
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 73
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 81
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...t them such as direction, cost, history and etc. These materials make the trip easy for ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...s places such as mountain, sea, desert, and etc. Moreover, the internet is accessible in...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, i think, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86604361371 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55748630726 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510903426791 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8158170131 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8823529412 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259738658701 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877653190506 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062238880908 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144421092996 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638146641113 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.