Imagine you have been offered jobs by two different companies at the same rate of pay. One of the companies will provide you with many interesting and challenging projects to work on, but it offers very few vacation days. The job at the other company do not seem very interesting or challenging, but offer more vacation days. Which job would you prefer and why?
The world has lots of different types of jobs, and everyone has their preferred notably jobs. This results in different views on whether a job offering more vacation days is better than an interesting and challenging job. I take the position that a job with many interesting and challenging projects to work on will be a perfectly acceptable choice for me.
To begin with, a job providing lots of interesting and challenging projects could let have more chances to improve my professional skills. For example, I used to work in a big software company in Taipei, which offered a good deal of creative projects to its employees. Even though I was a rookie, I always actively asked my supervisor to assign a few more tough tasks for me at that time. In the beginning, I didn’t often understand how to deal with these technical issues and make a number of severe mistakes. However, I strived for correcting these problems with great effort and accumulated many practical experiences. As a result, after facing lots of arduous work, I could finally finish an independent project on my own. Most importantly, I could learn an abundance of useful knowledge, like C++ or Java, which could improve my professional knowledge largely. By contrast, if I choose a job providing more vacation days, I will not be capable of getting some precious chances to better my professional skills and future career development.
Secondly, a job offering many interesting and challenging projects could make our life valuable and meaningful and get more opportunities to promote. For instance, I tended to put my all energy into solving some clients’ problems and assisting my colleagues in dealing with a few tough issues. Hence, I often received praise from supervisors and obtained an A+ on my performance evaluation because of bringing considerable profits to the company. In this way, I could gain a sense of achievement and make a little difference to my company and society. Furthermore, I could thereby gain more ideal opportunities to be promoted by achieving a couple of crucial missions. Instead, if I choose a job offering more vacation days, I will not have these kinds of valuable opportunities to advance my career and have a brighter future.
To sum up, these are the two reasons why I prefer a job providing more interesting and challenging projects. This kind of job not only can make me boost my practical skills but also will let me have a more meaningful life. Therefore, I think a job offer more interesting or challenging projects fit my life best.
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century old tradition of all female education and begin admitting men Pointing to other all female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation 52
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen based fuel cell engine which 80
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years 66
- Your university wants to improve the quality of students life in the dormitory Which one of the following do you think the school should build in dorms 1 quiet study area 2 exercise room for students to keep physical well being 3 room for entertainment 70
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95813953488 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0044999602 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4619678568 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.6 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276649421514 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925229577232 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731399718036 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19654982346 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394172312345 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95813953488 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0044999602 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4619678568 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.6 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276649421514 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925229577232 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731399718036 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19654982346 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394172312345 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.