To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors (not mine)
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not universities must investigate more money on professors' salary in order to improve the quality of education has received a great deal of attention from university managers and education experts. Although some may say that instead of spending money on salaries of professors, universities should investigate more money for equipping their laboratories and libraries; I as well as many others, believe that due to a large range of improvement in the education condition, universities must participate more money for professors' salary.
First of all, an important reason for spending more money on professors' salary is that professional and well known professors require high salaries. Many education experts state that as professors are the basis of the education system in the universities, the better professor university have the more education quality will be. Thus, universities have to spend a large amount of money to attract good professors.
Another reason for the importance of investigating more money on professors' salary is that with higher salaries the professors will become more enthusiastic in their job. It is commonly said that payment is the most important factor in the willingness of the workers in every jobs. This phenomena is true about university professors too. So, by participating more money on the professors' salary, they will work harder and develop the university educational quality. For example, professors with high salary spend much more time in the university because they do not need to work in other projects, subsequently, the students have more opportunities to be in touch with their professors and use their advices.
Finally. It is occasionally said that universities must investigate more money on professors' salary because it could result in better facility improvement of the universities. Most of the university managers have a lot of problem for equipping and improving the laboratories and libraries of their university, because it require a large amount of money and there are a lot of different laboratories in a university. Many experts suggest that university managers should spend their money for hiring well known professors. As industries are willing to work with these professor, they will investigate money for equipping the professors’ laboratory in the university. Therefore, spending money on professors' salary will indirectly results in better university facilities.
To sum up, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that universities should spend more money on salaries for professors chiefly due to valuable influence of good professors on the university and education quality.
- TPO22-Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom (not mine) 73
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily (not mine) 60
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors (not mine) 70
- TPO29 -To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 71
- TPO28-Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not universities must investigate more mone...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ersities must investigate more money on professors salary in order to improve the quality ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...rtant reason for spending more money on professors salary is that professional and well kn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...portance of investigating more money on professors salary is that with higher salaries the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...llingness of the workers in every jobs. This phenomena is true about university prof...
^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...e workers in every jobs. This phenomena is true about university professors too. S...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... So, by participating more money on the professors salary, they will work harder and devel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ir professors and use their advices. Finally. It is occasionally said that universit...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ersities must investigate more money on professors salary because it could result in bette...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...s. Most of the university managers have a lot of problem for equipping and improving the laborat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...braries of their university, because it require a large amount of money and there are a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 561, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this professor' or 'these professors'?
Suggestion: this professor; these professors
... As industries are willing to work with these professor, they will investigate money for equipp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 700, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...niversity. Therefore, spending money on professors salary will indirectly results in bette...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 734, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ey on professors salary will indirectly results in better university facilities. To ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53206650831 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16199039603 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418052256532 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3755057478 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5625 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3125 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.573119077613 0.236089414692 243% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242998220608 0.076458572812 318% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104754749095 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409416960599 0.150856017488 271% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490271297767 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 58.1214874552 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.002688172 210% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.