Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
As the technology growth, the issue of whether cars will using less on future has received a great deal of attention from scientists and people. Although some may argue that by growing new technology the need for using car will reduce, many others believe that the governments do not have the substructures to reducing the utilize usage of the cars. I am of the opinion that both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
Throughout the history, human being always have been developing new stuff. In this era, we are in the most developed time in all history. The technology has been growth in several fields and one of which is transportation. With this rate of promoting, transportation in twenty years will be evolved surprisingly. This evolution containing the accelerate and the comforting convenience of the transporters. The more get faster and simpler to use, the more inclined to use the public transportation in by people. For the purpose of illustration, in japan, the railway transportations have some specific train which can transfer people one place to another by the speed of about two hundred and seventy kilometers per hours which is a considerable speed rate.
A further reason why the number of the cars will be degraded in future is that in this machinery time people get a significant attention to consuming of their time. As the population of the world grows, driving has been more difficult than before. Driving a car involving people in traffic jams and it could waste their time for many hours. As result, it is believed that in the future tending to spend time on less unnecessary works such as driving will be diminished.
On the other hand, experts point out that the countries and the governments do not have necessary sub-structures for producing advanced public transportation. This means that it gets a great time and money to replace the manner of the transportation. As a case of point, because of lacking a suitable public transportation, in my country each people has his/her individual car.
In brief, contemplating all he aforementioned reasons, I can draw the conclusion that degrading the number of cars is more likely to happen. Nonetheless, it should be stressed this argument is not neglecting the necessitate of having the suitable sub-structure for countries, however it is axiomatic that the technology has been developing very fast and we could witness the substitution of public transportation by individual cars in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | King harald | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 63 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 76 | view |
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors (not mine) 70
- TPO43- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or 71
- TPO 22- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- TPO 44-Suspicious coins 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... growth, the issue of whether cars will using less on future has received a great dea...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... not have the substructures to reducing the utilize usage of the cars. I am of the opinion ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...further elaborate on this perspective. Throughout the history, human being alwa...
^^^
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
... Throughout the history, human being always have been developing new stuff. In this era, we a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...surprisingly. This evolution containing the accelerate and the comforting convenience of the t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs which is a considerable speed rate. A further reason why the number of the c...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s such as driving will be diminished. On the other hand, experts point out tha...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach people has his/her individual car. In brief, contemplating all he aforement...
^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tressed this argument is not neglecting the necessitate of having the suitable sub-structure fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nonetheless, so, in brief, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10401891253 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12742280151 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4245026767 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.631578947 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177364544838 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539163902818 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551794068971 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927228644073 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422040084313 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.