TPO33-Application of ancient stone balls
The lecture and the passage disscus the utilization of some ancient art if acts which have been recently discovered. Although the passage claims that there are three possible hypothesises for application of these artifacts, the speaker refutes these ideas through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First of all, the passage points out that these stone ball could be some weapons which are used for haunting or struggling. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that if these sotne balls were used for haunting, they would have some cracks; however, these artifacts have soft surfaces. She also states that common arrow were conventional on those times; then, these stone balls were not useful for haunting.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that because of having uniform shape, these artifacts could be used as a measurment in ancient trads; the speaker argues that this speculation is not ture. She also mentions that although these stone balls have uniform shape, their masses are different from each other due to reason that they have been created from distinct stones; therefore, their densities are not the same. So, they cannot be used as a measurement utility.
Finally, although the passage says that these artifacts could be a social marker for their owners, the professor disagrees by mentioning that all of the these stone balls do not have complex design and some of them have been carved in simple design. She also believes that on those times, the high class person would be buried with their possesions in their graves; however, these artifacts have been not found in graves.
Through the reasons which have been described above, the passage claims are rejected by the professor.
- TPO25-an archeologists finding 73
- TPO 30-It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
- TPO28 -Peary’s claim 80
- TPO23-Declination of Yellow cedar 85
- TPO 23- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... professor disagrees by mentioning that all of the these stone balls do not have complex d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15734265734 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37001301887 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51048951049 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2988396461 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162177854318 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777657217264 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394966629492 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965481507515 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425753866619 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.