To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether the universities should dedicate more money on salaries for university professors or not always has been one of the most problematic issue among governments and educational systems. Some believe that professors should be receiving more revenue in order to make their doing more efficiency. It is unquestionable that nowadays money have been become the solution for myriads of life’s problems. I am of the opinion declaring professor should be paid more. In what follows, I will cogently delve into my conspicuous reason to justify my stand point. Two reasons will be thoroughly elucidated in two paragraphs.
Firstly, the most important reason which is worth being taken into account is that nowadays living cost has increased and most of people have some monetary problem in their live. As a result they have to work entire the day or some of them have the tendency of attending in another job as a casual work. Having different jobs doesn’t allow people to their work as well.
Secondly, another pivotal reason which is worth being explained is that people always choose their career based on its income. In most of cases people go for most beneficiary jobs. Every society in order to make progress need well educated people. Good professors yield well educated people. Now if the professors not be paid well, no one will be eager to be a professor. As a result there will be a lack of well-educated which contribute to the lack of breakthrough in future.
To wrap it up, contemplation aforementioned reason one can effortlessly recapitulate that universities professors need to be paid more in other to concentrate only on their careers not financial drawbacks which may occupy them by doing casual works. Also if they don’t be satisfied in term of their salaries their positions will meet no one in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-24 | Rezabozorgpour | 70 | view |
- mass extinction in the end of the triassic period has three reason which was rejected by lecture. 61
- asking recommendation 40
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow student or co- worker- than those from high level, such as teachers or supervisors? 71
- people are more satisfied of doing different tasks in one workday rather than one task. do you agree or disagree? 70
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... nowadays living cost has increased and most of people have some monetary problem in their liv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...no one will be eager to be a professor. As a result there will be a lack of well-e...
^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... contribute to the lack of breakthrough in future. To wrap it up, contemplation aforemen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reason one can effortlessly recapitulate that universities professors need to be ...
^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... may occupy them by doing casual works. Also if they don't be satisfied in term...
^^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...laries their positions will meet no one in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r positions will meet no one in future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04934210526 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8819075005 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.492424196 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2941176471 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12622686658 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451586935049 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759047564717 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845955345169 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942560225226 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.