To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the importance of the role that financial support plays in the life of people. There is a hot debate on the relationship between the increase in the salaries of the professors and improvements in education. Although some may believe that educational matters are not related to the monetary aspects, However, I feel quite the opposite. In my perspective, adequate salary would result in a prosperous educational system since professors would have more time to dedicate to academic matters, they would mentally satisfied, and they could better support students financially.
First and foremost, It is crystal clear that most of the academic staff would like to do part-time jobs related to their profession to gain more money. With improvements in the salary payment, they would find more time to work with students, because they do not worry about financial matters.
Second, enhancement in salaries would provide more mental relief for academic members. They can spend extra money on travel for instance. After having a good weekend, they would be more satisfied mentally so that they can start a new working week with enormous energy and interest. An academic survey illustrates that professors who are mentally in excellent condition could contribute more educationally.
Last but not least, the improvement of the salary would result in more support for the students. In most group projects, students need to have monetary aid for their equipment, which is necessary for experiments. Professors, who have big grants, could solve this issue quickly. Since they are aware of the students' problem.
For the matter of the conclusion, considering the mentioned reasons, I think it is evident that helping academic staff financially, would lead to a flourishing system of education. Even though it was just a story in a nutshell, and there are other reasons for improvements in education in this case. Growing the amounts of payments not only improve the mental health of the professors but also prove opportunities to the professors to help students as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 547, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'satisfy'
Suggestion: satisfy
...o academic matters, they would mentally satisfied, and they could better support students...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...grants, could solve this issue quickly. Since they are aware of the students problem....
^^^^^
Line 13, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ue quickly. Since they are aware of the students problem. For the matter of the con...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, for instance, i feel, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24483775811 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85166683263 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8930605907 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.588235294 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199788408602 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732233510155 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597503577811 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11863233348 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270821307575 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.