Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the importance of the role which job plays in modern society. A controversial question that is often raised in the area is the quantity of the work that an individual should do in limited or unlimited days. Some may believe that compact hours of work in limited days are enjoyable compared to the work the whole week but in shorter hours. I, for one, think that the latter opinion is better. Considering the efficiency, family life, and monetary aspects, I feel it is more convenient to work gradually but moderately.
First and foremost, It is crystal clear that the more you work, the more of the quality of the work will be damaged. The concentration of the works on limited days would result in inaccurate jobs, which is full of errors since the individuals have worked on the stressful environment due to lack of enough quality time.
Another equally important reason is losing well-managed relations with family members. Because in the working days, one should focus on the job for consecutive hours, and when arrives home has no energy to socialize with others. On the other hand, in times of weeks that one stays a long hour in-home, he or she may become bored.
Last but not least, undoubtedly, the quality of the work is the paramount factor in employers' satisfaction. When the quality of the job is affected owing to the fact that the job holders could not concentrate well as they lose their energy in successive projects in the limited time of the week, the satisfaction of the buss is not accomplished. Therefore the financial promotion is not gained.
To sum up, I think it is now clear that working should be divided throughout the week in order to be efficient, also would not harm the family relations. Working continuously in exchange for having some days off would not only harm the quality of the works but also contribute to the unsatisfied results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... in limited or unlimited days. Some may believe that compact hours of work in limited d...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...action of the buss is not accomplished. Therefore the financial promotion is not gained. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, i feel, i think, in short, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78443113772 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69266896101 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541916167665 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3445963888 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333994638492 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984006248958 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725470321293 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17153860617 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446314474677 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.