It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
In modern life, human knowledge have being developed with rapid speed. Some people said that we should have broad knowledge of many academic subjects. Some scientists believed that we should specialize in one specific subject. From my perspective, I am better convinced by the latter by the following reason.
First reason came to my mind is have broad knowledge will help you easier to find a job. When you have an interview for a job, if you have good knowledge in your major but you do not have knowledge of interview , you will fail. Moreover, if it has many specialists in your field, you will have more competitor and your possibility you get job will decrease. Take my friend, Ho Duc Hieu, as an example, he has lost job opportunities because of stronger competitor in the same field with him. By the large, I believed that human should have broad knowlegde.
Secondly, I believed that having broad knowledge will help us easier to connect with people. Take my partner as an example, he have meet his wife at our friend's party. Fortunately, he has the knowledge about his wife job and luckily his wife has been heard about his job before so they have had a great conversation and they have married last month. In addition, when you meet another company in order to seek a contract to develop your company, you must have a lot of knowledge to discuss with that company.
In conclusion, more possibility for job and helping us connect with people are my reasons for my oppinion. It is highly recommended that people should carefully consider my writting before making decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-12 | catalinadebug | 73 | view |
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 60
- Television advertising directed towards young children ( aged two to five ) should not be allowed. 80
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The only effective way for government to encourage energy conservation is increasing the price of gasoline and electricity 85
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uman knowledge have being developed with rapid speed. Some people said that we sh...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...son. First reason came to my mind is have broad knowledge will help you easier to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t you do not have knowledge of interview , you will fail. Moreover, if it has many...
^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ople. Take my partner as an example, he have meet his wife at our friends party. For...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 275.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78545454545 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61342164505 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534545454545 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0896856346 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7333333333 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247857492202 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930757563193 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083359721195 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156402975021 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13527277705 0.0645574589148 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.