It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
Nowadays, the world are becoming more international, and people are changing to have more diversity lifestyles. However, as far as I am concerned, it is still better to live in one place all you life as the traditional way. I hold this view for several reasons, and I will demonstrate in the subsequent passage.
First and foremost, no one can deny that evryone needs a sense of belonging, which is easier to be aquired when you always live in the same town. My father's experience is a compelling example, which shows how a single place increases the sense of belonging. When he was in his 20s, he was occupied with his work, which needs him to travel from place to place. At the beginning, my father felt interested, because he could know different cultures and customs of many places. This feeling didn't last long, for he gradually noticed how lonely he was when he stayed outside alone. So, he decided to settle after he met my mom, who has a stable work in hometown. He changed his job into one that do not require many business trips. Then, he reacquired the hsense of belonging and lived a happy life.
In addition, people can have more close friends and deep communication when they live in the same place for a long time. Some people will say that people can make various friends when they move from a city to another. On the other hand, we have to realize that people can only have real and strong connection with others after they have spend enough time with each other. When you move quikly, the friends you make are only acquientences, rather than sincere friends. For example, I have friends both from middle school and work as most people do. I can easily feel the distiction when I treat them, I told my strongest emotion to my friends from middle school, because I believe can rely on them. In contrast, it is hard for me to share my privite feelings with so called friends from work, since we just met a couple of times. If I had never spent long time with my friends from school, I would not have truely interaction with them.
In conclusion, I stands on the side that it is better to live in a single place through your whole life. This is because more time in one place give us a sense of belonging, and because we have more opportunities to make truely friends.
- Most times we think the people who are taking in charge can decide the future of our society while young people who have less power have little influence to the world On the contrary I hold the firm belief that young people are having strong influence to 73
- People who develop many different skills are more successful 70
- creative 80
- Most times we think the people who are taking in charge can decide the future of our society while young people who have less power have little influence to the world On the contrary I hold the firm belief that young people are having strong influence to 76
- global 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nd customs of many places. This feeling didnt last long, for he gradually noticed how...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... connection with others after they have spend enough time with each other. When you m...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'stand'
Suggestion: stand
...eraction with them. In conclusion, I stands on the side that it is better to live i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51442307692 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44941425192 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514423076923 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.949493341 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8095238095 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215658555453 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679997619927 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785949953548 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147387196908 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525209099544 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.