It is better to spend time with one or two close friends than with a large number of friends.

Essay topics:

It is better to spend time with one or two close friends than with a large number of friends.

Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends than with a large number of friends. However I prefer to spend time with a large number of friends rather than with one or two close friends for the following two reasons.

To begin with, it is easier to develop deeper connection with a small number of people. A new study published that it takes about 50 hours of time with someone before you consider them a casual friend, 90 hours before you become a real friend, and about 200 hours to become close friends. In these days, most of people are very busy that we need to choose and concentrate on a small number of friends. To be specific, I usually meet a small group whenever I have a free time after finishing my work. We can meet once or twice a month at best because we are all busy for working. For this reason, I agree with the statement.

Furthermore, when we going out with only a few friends, people tend to feel more comfortable in a small group. It is more easier to make a meaningful conversation. Having deep, engaging conversations needs to be a part of life because it allows us to connect with others. Thus, it results in a deeper happiness. For instance, whenever I have a problem in my life, I used to talk with my best friend for a long time. This is a great way to connect with someone when I do not really know them. It can help drive a connection between both of us because the I may believe that the person i am talking to genuinely cares about my well-being. Thus, I agree with the statement.

To sum up, I agree with the statement for the following two reasons. it is easier to drive a deeper connection with a small number of people. Also, people tend to feel more comfortable in a small group.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-18 Muffine 60 view
2018-10-01 Foxman 70 view
2018-08-31 saurya 71 view
2017-07-06 Evgeniya 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Muffine :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...with one or two close friends than with a large number of friends. However I prefer to spend time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ds than with a large number of friends. However I prefer to spend time with a large num...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ds. However I prefer to spend time with a large number of friends rather than with one or two clo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...asier to develop deeper connection with a small number of people. A new study published that it t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...to become close friends. In these days, most of people are very busy that we need to choose an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...at we need to choose and concentrate on a small number of friends. To be specific, I usually meet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 119, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ore comfortable in a small group. It is more easier to make a meaningful conversation. Havi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of life because it allows us to connect with others. Thus, it results in a deepe...
^^
Line 6, column 553, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'I'?
Suggestion: the; I
...a connection between both of us because the I may believe that the person i am talkin...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 587, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...cause the I may believe that the person i am talking to genuinely cares about my ...
^
Line 8, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...tatement for the following two reasons. it is easier to drive a deeper connection ...
^^
Line 8, column 118, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...asier to drive a deeper connection with a small number of people. Also, people tend to feel more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, thus, well, for instance, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34250764526 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46853592869 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464831804281 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7052854831 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7368421053 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473052828648 0.236089414692 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155000908163 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206237899701 0.0737576698707 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343260943281 0.150856017488 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.258393496295 0.0645574589148 400% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.31 8.01818996416 79% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 86.8835125448 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.