The books are the steps of human beings development, with whch various kinds of knowledge were tanscended by of predecessors, from Aristotle to Steven Hawking, from the bdlief of the GOD to the Nano-Technology. It is ture that we can learn many knowledges from the books, while in my opinion, there are some other kinds of knowledge that we can not learn from the books, or in another word, practicing is the criterion of value the truth, also, we can learn some lessons form our experince. In gerneral, the books are on behalf of the human being's wisdom, is more important for us to learn knowledges. I will address my views thereinafter.
First of all, the daily life actually is a good teahcer for us who can guide us when we meet troubles. In this point, not all the books could tell you the real situation you would confront in reality. Once in a little town in the US ,I was driving in the street with out attetion to the speed, then the police drivng the car was pulling mre over. He said I was driving faster than the limit when I was passing by a school, while I was not aware of this case. Later, the police fined me. This lesson was remembered by me , even if there is a rule which regulate the speed, I would not rememeber so clear if I was not fined by the police. This lesson was impressive in my mind and no books could give me such a memory.
Secondly, the books with knowledge would be out of date sometimes. As we had considered the earth is the Center of the Comsmos for thousands of years, after the endeavor of generations of scientist which at the expense of death, we finnaly found the heliocentrism is the correct theory. Likewise, I was shocked by knowing that the sum of all natural integers is -1/12,merely have been proved correctly by the mathemacitians, which could not be explained by any books. Thus as we are reading books we should be aware that not all the conception in books are correct., especially in History, which is like a little girl who was made up by others whatever they want.
Finally, however, there are other ways we can learn, and some of the books' ideas were inaacurate, I should say that the books are more important than other methods of learning. In that books which dilivered the classic theory could equip us with a right attitude toward the society and the science. Our education would not run well without the books or slight on books instead concerntrate on practicing. As we know if we do not learn knowledge from books to absorb the experince of our predcessors, we could not practice well, let aone making progress.
In all, we should not narrow down the way of us to learn the knowledge, due to the development of the scientific technology, there are more and more paths to cultivate ourselves like the Internet, while I believe we should put the books for the first place of learning materials, they are the more important guidance for us to access to new fields of the world.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting y 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did t 49
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 55
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the st 66
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
The books are the steps of human beings development, with whch various kinds of...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 542, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...l, the books are on behalf of the human beings wisdom, is more important for us to lea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reality. Once in a little town in the US ,I was driving in the street with out att...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
... in the US ,I was driving in the street with out attetion to the speed, then the police ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ned me. This lesson was remembered by me , even if there is a rule which regulate ...
^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ch could not be explained by any books. Thus as we are reading books we should be aw...
^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... there are other ways we can learn, and some of the books ideas were inaacurate, I should s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 15.1003584229 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52808988764 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59175308113 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477528089888 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7097675006 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154731335045 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470858055807 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538062705272 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982890421125 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743446613169 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.